Panelists discuss how outdated coverage decisions can worsen outcomes and increase costs by delaying access to safer, evidence-supported BTK inhibitor therapies.
Panelists discuss how delays and denials arising from evidence-coverage misalignment can directly harm patient outcomes. They describe scenarios where patients are required to use older Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors with known toxicity profiles before accessing newer, safer options.
These forced step edits can increase adverse events, treatment discontinuations, and overall healthcare costs. Panelists underscore that aligning coverage with the most current clinical evidence is not only medically sound but economically rational, as early adoption of effective therapies reduces downstream complications and resource utilization.
They conclude that payers and providers must collaborate on evidence-sharing mechanisms and real-world data analytics to close the gap between what is proven effective and what is reimbursed.