- Center on Health Equity & Access
- Clinical
- Health Care Cost
- Health Care Delivery
- Insurance
- Policy
- Technology
- Value-Based Care
Elacestrant Usage in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: Clinical Guidelines and Patient Profiles
Experts discuss how they determine whether a patient with metastatic breast cancer is a candidate for treatment with elacestrant based on FDA approved indication, NCCN guidelines, and the results of ESR1 mutation and resistance marker testing. Participants also discuss how they determine treatment failure or resistance.
EP: 1.Evolution of Endocrine Therapies in ER+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 2.Efficacy and Safety of Oral SERDs and Other Endocrine Therapies in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 3.Elacestrant Usage in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: Clinical Guidelines and Patient Profiles
EP: 4.ESR1 Mutation Testing and Precision Medicine in Patients With ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 5.Elacestrant in Later-Line Treatment of ER+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 6.Elacestrant: Treatment Considerations, Including Dosing and Compliance
EP: 7.Elacestrant: Adverse Effects and Their Management, and Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life
EP: 8.Emerging Agents and Clinical Perspectives in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 9.Overview of ESR1 Mutations in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 10.Best Practices for ESR1 Mutation Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer
EP: 11.The Role of Oral SERDs in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 12.Oral SERDs in Development for ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 13.Research Landscape: Endocrine Therapies for ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
This is a video synopsis/summary of a Peer Exchange featuring Mabel Mardones, MD; Rena Callahan, MD; William Gradishar, MD; and Gregory Vidal, MD, PhD.
Mardones discusses the clinical use of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) with Callahan and Vidal. Callahan follows guidelines, using elacestrant in second- or third-line settings for patients with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy and ESR1 mutations. They consider patient preferences for oral therapies and discuss potential broader use.
Mardones and Callahan explore secondary resistance, emphasizing ESR1 mutations and prior CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy duration as markers for optimal elacestrant outcomes. Regarding treatment failure, both doctors stress relying on disease progression observed in scans and clinical indicators for timely therapy adjustments.
This dialogue provides practical insights into incorporating oral SERDs into clinical practices, considering guidelines and individual patient factors.
Video synopsis is AI-generated and reviewed by AJMC® editorial staff.
EHA Plenary Abstracts Zoom in From Investigational Drugs to Molecular Signatures
June 14th 2025Abstracts presented during the plenary session of the 2025 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress spanned from novel drug regimens for myeloma and lymphoma to investigation of leukemias on the molecular and genetic levels.
Read More
COVID-19 Deaths Cloud Interpretation of Acalabrutinib-Venetoclax Combo Results
June 13th 2025A combination of acalabrutinib and venetoclax showed better results with the addition of obinutuzumab, whereas mixed findings in a cross-trial comparison were complicated by the inclusion of deaths related to COVID-19.
Read More
Measurable Residual Disease in Decision-Making: An Opportunity, but Not a Promise
June 13th 2025Skepticism still persists around the use of measurable residual disease (MRD) for clinical and regulatory decision-making in the European context, but panelists explained the next steps that are required to advance the use of MRD.
Read More
