- Center on Health Equity & Access
- Clinical
- Health Care Cost
- Health Care Delivery
- Insurance
- Policy
- Technology
- Value-Based Care
Efficacy and Safety of Oral SERDs and Other Endocrine Therapies in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
Experts explore the efficacy and safety profiles of elacestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), and other options for endocrine therapy. The panelists also discuss clinical trial insights, progression-free survival rates, and tolerability, highlighting outcomes and advances in metastatic breast cancer treatment.
EP: 1.Evolution of Endocrine Therapies in ER+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 2.Efficacy and Safety of Oral SERDs and Other Endocrine Therapies in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 3.Elacestrant Usage in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: Clinical Guidelines and Patient Profiles
EP: 4.ESR1 Mutation Testing and Precision Medicine in Patients With ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 5.Elacestrant in Later-Line Treatment of ER+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 6.Elacestrant: Treatment Considerations, Including Dosing and Compliance
EP: 7.Elacestrant: Adverse Effects and Their Management, and Impact of Treatment on Quality of Life
EP: 8.Emerging Agents and Clinical Perspectives in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 9.Overview of ESR1 Mutations in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 10.Best Practices for ESR1 Mutation Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer
EP: 11.The Role of Oral SERDs in ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 12.Oral SERDs in Development for ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
EP: 13.Research Landscape: Endocrine Therapies for ER+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer
This is a video synopsis/summary of a Peer Exchange featuring Mabel Mardones, MD; Rena Callahan, MD; William Gradishar, MD; and Gregory Vidal, MD, PhD.
Mardones discusses the efficacy and safety of oral SERDs with experts Callahan, Gradishar, and Vidal. Callahan highlights the favorable efficacy of oral elacestrant, which shows double median progression-free survival (PFS) and triple landmark PFS at 1 year compared with standard therapy. Gradishar notes elacestrant’s favorable safety profile, which is well tolerated with minimal dosing adjustments.
Vidal compares elacestrant with fulvestrant, emphasizing elacestrant’s oral administration, superior efficacy––especially in ESR1 mutations––and a similar safety profile. The discussion underscores elacestrant’s promising role in metastatic breast cancer treatment, providing valuable insights for clinicians.
Video synopsis is AI-generated and reviewed by AJMC® editorial staff.
Study Finds Obesity May Worsen Multiple Sclerosis: Genetic Analysis Points to Causal Link
November 21st 2024A new study aimed at exploring the relationship between obesity and multiple sclerosis severity using genetic data finds that higher BMI and other obesity measures were associated with increased disability progression in patients with MS.
Read More
Insurance Insights: Dr Jason Shafrin Estimates DMD Insurance Value
July 18th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the July 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that estimates the insurance value of novel Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) treatment.
Listen
Higher Life’s Essential 8 Scores Associated With Reduced COPD Risk
November 21st 2024Higher Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) scores, especially those reflecting lower nicotine exposure and better sleep health, are inversely associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) risk, emphasizing the importance of cardiovascular health (CVH) in disease prevention.
Read More
