Dr Raj Chovatiya Provides Evidence Supporting Oral JAK Inhibitor Use to Treat AD

EP: 1.Ruxolitinib Cream Improves AD Across Body Regions, Shows Efficacy, Safety in Black Patients

EP: 2.Upcoming Generics Provide New Considerations and Opportunities for Savings

EP: 3.Managed Care Has a Key Role in Biosimilar Adoption, Says Cardinal's Oskouei

EP: 4.Dr John Harris: There Are a Lot of Reasons to Talk About Vitiligo at This Year’s AAD Meeting

EP: 5.Dermatologists’ Focus to Delve Below the Skin at Annual Conference

EP: 6.Experts Herald “Year of the JAK Inhibitor” in Dermatology

EP: 7.Dr Monica Li Highlights Advances in Microneedling

EP: 8.Dr Eva Parker: Climate Change Has Been Impacting Skin Diseases for Years

EP: 9.Dermatology Data Can Direct Policy Priorities, but Gaps Reflect Inequities of Care

EP: 10.Dr John Harris Outlines the Outcomes of Stopping Treatment With Ruxolitinib Cream for Vitiligo

EP: 11.Late-Breaking Abstracts Demonstrate Value of Persistence With Ruxolitinib Cream for Vitiligo

EP: 12.Examining Dermatological Care for Transgender Patients

EP: 13.How Our Understanding of Inflammatory Skin Disease Has Evolved From the 4 Humors to Targeted Therapies

EP: 14.Dr Haley Naik Discusses Using Biologics and the Drug Pipeline for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

EP: 15.Drs Dellavalle and Rodriguez Discuss Disparities in Prescription Patterns for Atopic Dermatitis

EP: 16.Posters Show Success of Ruxolitinib Cream in Alleviating Facial Vitiligo Symptoms, Reducing Noticeability

EP: 17.Investigators Highlight Disparities Evident in Skin Disease Care, Data Collection

EP: 18.Studies Presented at AAD Examine Safety and Satisfaction of Tildrakizumab for Psoriasis

EP: 19.Patients With AD Have More Options With Biologics, JAK Inhibitors, Says Dr Emma Guttman-Yassky

EP: 20.Dermatologists Looking to the Future Will Need to Be Their Own Advocates, Panel Says

EP: 21.Teledermatology Can Increase Access for Patients With High-Risk Melanoma: Erik Jaklitsch

EP: 22.Dr Sancy Leachman: Melanoma Metastasizes Quickly, Needs to Be Caught Early

EP: 23.Panel Discusses Treating Acne, Psoriasis in Dermatology Patients

EP: 24.New and Upcoming Treatment for Vitiligo, Atopic Dermatitis

EP: 25.Long-Term Safety of Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

EP: 26.Evaluating Label Warnings, Switching Rates in Patients With Psoriasis Initiating New Treatment

EP: 27.ICYMI: Highlights From RAD 2023

EP: 28.AAD 2024 to Feature Topics Including JAK Inhibitors, Biologics

EP: 29.Dr Amy Paller Previews the 2024 AAD Annual Conference

EP: 30.Ruxolitinib Reduces Extent, Severity of AD and Need for Other Treatments

EP: 31.Dr Raj Chovatiya Outlines Who Is a Good Candidate for Oral JAK Inhibitors

EP: 32.Atopic Dermatitis in Adults: Challenges and Treatment Strategies

EP: 33.Dr Robert Sidbury: Understanding What Makes a Dermatology Practice Successful

EP: 34.Dr Monica Li Discusses Tailoring Microneedling Treatments to Meet Each Patient's Need

EP: 35.Skin Tone Bias Persists in Google Searches for Vitiligo

EP: 36.Management of HS Requires Both Coordination, Communication Between Patients and Providers

EP: 37.Dr Jonathan Silverberg Discusses Findings on the Safety, Efficacy of Nemolizumab at 48 Weeks

EP: 38.Biologic, Topical Therapies Both Effective in Treating AD in Skin of Color

EP: 39.Late-Breaking Abstracts Highlight Promising Therapies in AD, Hidradenitis Suppurativa

EP: 40.Dr Jeff Stark: Pain Reduction With Bimekizumab-bkzx in Patients With HS

EP: 41.Dr Martin Dahl Discusses the Pathophysiology of AD and Benefits of ANB032

EP: 42.New Study Links Social Factors to Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity

EP: 43.Dr Laura Ferris Discusses Safety, Efficacy of JNJ-2113 in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis

EP: 44.Dr Shawn Kwatra Shares Efficacy, Safety Data of Nemolizumab in Patients With PN

EP: 45.Brodalumab Is Effective, Safe in Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

EP: 46.Patients With Vitiligo Suffer Heightened Stigma, Mental Health Risks

EP: 47.Racial Variations in Cardiovascular Outcomes Found in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Study

EP: 48.Autoimmune Comorbidities Prevalent in Patients With Vitiligo

EP: 49.Skin Cancer Incidence Highest Among Rural, SOC Individuals

EP: 50.Dupilumab Considered Safe, Effective Treatment for Adolescent, Adult Patients With AD

EP: 51.Gaps in Skincare Knowledge, Sun Protection Practice Exist Among Patients With Lupus

Now Viewing

EP: 52.Dr Raj Chovatiya Provides Evidence Supporting Oral JAK Inhibitor Use to Treat AD

EP: 53.Undertreatment, Biologic Access Gaps Identified in Psoriasis Treatment

EP: 54.Dr Raj Chovatiya Explains Oral JAK Inhibitor Monitoring Protocols for AD Treatment

EP: 55.Dr Monica Li Lists Microneedling Considerations, Precautions

EP: 56.Dr Jonathan Silverberg Describes AD Diagnosis, Treatment in Children vs Adults

EP: 57.Dr Lawrence Eichenfield Discusses Positive Results of Roflumilast Cream 0.05% in Pediatric Patients With AD

EP: 58.Dr Robert Sidbury on Implementing Value-Based Care Initiatives in a Pediatric Dermatology Practice

EP: 59.Dr Monica Li Explains Efficacy, Safety Differences Between Different Microneedling Techniques

EP: 60.Dr Lawrence Eichenfield Hopeful for New Pediatric AD Treatment Option

EP: 61.Dr Martina Porter Shares Findings on Ruxolitinib Cream in Patients With HS

EP: 62.Dr Martin Dahl Summarizes Findings, Limitations of Study Analyzing ANB032 Use in Patients With AD

Raj Chovatiya, MD, PhD, associate professor at the Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, provided current clinical evidence supporting the use of oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors to treat patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Chovatiya is also the founder and director of the Center for Medical Dermatology and Immunology Research in Chicago, Illinois.

Transcript

Could you provide insights into the current clinical evidence supporting the use of oral JAK inhibitors for patients with AD, including efficacy, safety profiles, and potential long-term outcomes?

Whenever we're talking about any therapy, oral JAK inhibitors included, you want to give the good with the bad, the positive with the negative. So, I'll start with the good stuff.

When it comes to thinking about oral JAK inhibitors, particularly at their higher dosing—both abrocitinib and upadacitinib have a lower dose and a higher dose)—it's some of the highest efficacy we've really ever seen for atopic dermatitis therapies. There's been a variety of indirect comparisons in recent years using what's called a network meta-analysis to sort of compare across different trials. What ends up coming out every single time, typically, is that upadacitinib 30 milligrams and abrocitinib 200 milligrams tend to be your best shot at getting the highest rates of clearance and also getting the highest rates of itch response. The biologics then seem to slot right after that.

Now, what is going to be the trade-off? Well, with the higher doses of the oral JAK inhibitors, you're going to be thinking about some common safety adverse event issues. These aren't really the box warning issues; those are really quite rare, altogether, and there isn't any clear evidence of that being a reliable risk and adverse event in the real world. In the case of abrocitinib: nausea, dizziness, and things like that. In the case of upadacitinib: acne probably being the more common one. Across both of them, thinking about herpes simplex and herpes zoster–related exacerbations.

Now, the good news is that we've accumulated longer and longer and longer term data, and a bit of real-world data, which gives us some reassurance in a couple of regards. Number one, efficacy sure seems to hold up compared to what we've seen in clinical trials, and I can speak to that for my own practice. If anything, the lower dose of the JAK inhibitors probably performs even better than you may expect based on the clinical trials.

Now, when we think about safety, the good news is that the safety profile in the real world has also largely been reflected. If anything, there hasn't been necessarily a clear risk for some of the longer-term extension data. In the case of upadacitinib now, this is the longest we have, going up to about 5 years, of these events of being thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular event, and malignancy really being directly connected to the drug itself.

In fact, some nice analyses have shown that, when you sort of look at epidemiologic data in atopic dermatitis patients, generally, and then look at sort of the data from long-term extension arms of these drug studies, it looks like probably you're hovering right around the normal background rate of these events in the atopic dermatitis patient population in general.