Laura Ferris, MD, PhD, professor of dermatology, University of Pittsburgh, shares 16-week safety and efficacy data from the FRONTIER 2 clinical trial on JNJ-2113 for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
This content was produced independently by The American Journal of Managed Care® and is not endorsed by the American Academy of Dermatology.
At the end of the study period, 76.2% of patients experienced significant improvements in symptoms after 16 weeks of JNJ-2113, the first and only investigational targeted oral peptide designed to block the interleukin-23 (IL-23) receptor to treat patients with plaque psoriasis, says Laura Ferris, MD, PhD, professor of dermatology, University of Pittsburgh.
Transcript
Can you provide an overview of the methodology used in the phase 2b FRONTIER 2 clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of JNJ-2113 in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis?
This was a double blind, placebo controlled, multidose study. Patients started in a study called FRONTIER 1, where they received either a placebo or 1 of 5 doses of an oral peptide. The primary end point of that study was week 16. For FRONTIER 2, patients at week 16 went into a long-term extension where they continued on the dose of medication they were already taking, or for those patients taking placebo, they crossed over to another dose of 100 mg once a day, which was the second highest dose studied.
The efficacy end point that we use for most psoriasis studies is a PASI [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index] response looking at the percentage of patients who have reached a certain threshold. The primary end point for this was the percentage of patients that reach a PASI 75 response, so 75% improvement. But we also looked at PASI 90, so 90%, and even PASI 100, so complete clearance, and also Investigators Global Assessment of clear skin or clear/almost clear skin, as well. Other efficacy end points that we looked at were improvement in scalp psoriasis, patients signs and symptoms of psoriasis, and then safety as well.
What were the primary end points of the study, and how were they measured?
The primary end point of the study was PASI 75 response, so looking at the area and severity index of patients when they started the study, at the beginning of FRONTIER 1 and the placebo control period, and then looking out to 1 year to see what percentage of patients had skin that was 75% or more improved. For the highest dose, which is 100 mg BID [twice daily], 76.2% of patients had an improvement in their PASI score of 75% or greater.
STEER Data Open Door to SMA Gene Therapy for Wider Age Range of Children
March 19th 2025Delivery of onasemnogene abeparvovec into the intrathecal space was safe and effective for children with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) aged 2 to 17 years, who had previously been shut out of receiving gene therapy.
Read More
Navigating Sport-Related Neurospine Injuries, Surgery, and Managed Care
February 25th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Arthur L. Jenkins III, MD, FACS, CEO of Jenkins NeuroSpine, to explore the intersection of advanced surgical care for sport-related neurospine injuries and managed care systems.
Listen
Neurologists Share Tips for Securing Patient Access to Gene Therapies
March 19th 2025Tenacious efforts at every level, from the individual clinician to the hospital to the state to Congress, will be needed to make sure patients can access life-saving gene therapies for neuromuscular diseases.
Read More
EMBARK Data Show Continued Improvements With DMD Gene Therapy
March 19th 2025Data from the EMBARK trial of delandistrogene moxeparvovec in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) show that benefits in functional outcomes, gene expression, and muscle imaging persist 2 years after receiving the gene therapy.
Read More
How Access to SMA Treatment Varies Globally and by Insurance Type
March 18th 2025Posters presented at the 2025 Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) Clinical & Scientific Conference show that therapeutic advances in treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are not uniformly making it into the hands of patients who could benefit.
Read More