Experts discuss optimal utilization of CSCC and BCC staging systems and risk stratification to guide treatment decisions and the appropriate timing for active surveillance vs intervention.
This is a video synopsis/summary of a Peer Exchange involving Jason Luke, MD, FACP; Christopher Barker, MD; Omid Hamid, MD; Vishal Patel, MD; and Catherine Pisano, MD.
Patel explained that while dermatologic risk stratification focuses on recurrence potential to guide surgical margins, oncologic staging assesses metastatic risk and mortality. For medical oncologists, Patel advised developing relationships with dermatology to jointly discuss moderately and highly rated cSCC disease under either system early, as these aggressive tumors will likely recur and ultimately need systemic therapy. Luke asked Barker to describe factors determining tumor resectability. Barker emphasized starting with a thorough history and physical to guide tests selection while getting specialist input. He explained resection candidacy involves both tumor considerations and acceptable patient trade-offs between surgery/radiation morbidity and disease control. Barker stated when curative-intent surgery and radiation are declined, systemic therapy is considered, often initially in the neoadjuvant setting, which requires additional study.
Video synopsis is AI-generated and reviewed by AJMC® editorial staff.
EHA Plenary Abstracts Zoom in From Investigational Drugs to Molecular Signatures
June 14th 2025Abstracts presented during the plenary session of the 2025 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress spanned from novel drug regimens for myeloma and lymphoma to investigation of leukemias on the molecular and genetic levels.
Read More
COVID-19 Deaths Cloud Interpretation of Acalabrutinib-Venetoclax Combo Results
June 13th 2025A combination of acalabrutinib and venetoclax showed better results with the addition of obinutuzumab, whereas mixed findings in a cross-trial comparison were complicated by the inclusion of deaths related to COVID-19.
Read More
Measurable Residual Disease in Decision-Making: An Opportunity, but Not a Promise
June 13th 2025Skepticism still persists around the use of measurable residual disease (MRD) for clinical and regulatory decision-making in the European context, but panelists explained the next steps that are required to advance the use of MRD.
Read More