Both oncologists and primary care physicians need to work together to improve patient outcomes while also maintaining cost-effective strategies, said Susan M. Escudier, MD, FACP, vice president of value-based care and quality programs and regional medical director, Texas Oncology, in an interview with Evidence-Based Oncology (EBO).
EBO: What should cancer specialists know about working with primary care physicians?
Escudier: I think it’s very important to realize that we have overlapping goals, but our goals are not identical. The primary care organizations have to take care of all the patient’s needs. And I think that is actually quite valuable to us because they can give us assistance helping patients stay on treatment by managing their comorbidities, by managing their other medications. I think that they want to be in the loop, they want to know what’s going on, and they want to have some say, at times, in terms of where we refer the patient for things like surgeries or imaging. They may have specific value-based care contracts that require them to use certain institutions over others.
EBO: What metrics or key performance indicators measure the success of a value-based partnership between oncology specialists and primary care physicians?
Escudier: I think it’s really important that we look at patient outcomes. We have to have good patient outcomes because care can’t be cost-
effective unless it’s effective. We want to make sure that the oncologists are following national guidelines; we want to meet the quality criteria, patient satisfaction, and the cost of care. We have to show that we have a handle on the cost of care without compromising patient outcomes.
EBO: What value-based strategies or interventions can be or have been implemented to ensure seamless transitions of care between oncology specialists and primary care physicians?
Escudier: I think it’s really all about communication and being responsive. Our practice, for example, has an initiative to get new patients in very quickly so that those patients can get taken care of, and that’s going to help with our patient satisfaction scores. I think that we have to be in line with their priorities in terms of the insurance companies and the payers. So, for example, if we’re in an ACO [accountable care organization] and we send consultations or imaging outside of the ACO institutions, that may have an unfavorable outcome in terms of the primary care physician meeting their metrics, as well as ours.
Uniting to Support Patients With Cancer Beyond Treatment
November 17th 2024Kasey Bond, MPH, of Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, speaks to why it’s vital to keep patients at the center of all strategic partnerships between academic institutions and community-based oncology practices.
Read More
Nathan Walcker Discusses Value-Based Oncology Care Initiatives at FCS
September 8th 2023Nathan Walcker, CEO at Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute (FCS), highlights some of the recent partnerships and initiatives at FCS to improve community-based oncology care from a value-based perspective.
Listen
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Dr Debra Patt of Texas Oncology
August 1st 2023Debra Patt, MD, PhD, MBA, joins hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, for episode 2 of our newest podcast, "Oncology Onward: Conversations With Innovators and Changemakers in Cancer Care."
Listen
Adapting Cancer Treatment for Survivorship and Precision Care
November 7th 2024The American Journal of Managed Care® and Vanderbilt University Medical Center partnered on a recent Institute for Value-Based Medicine® event, which had the theme, “Bringing the Future to the Present in Cancer Care.”
Read More
The Challenge of Addressing Drug Spend to Drive Down Total Cost of Care in EOM
October 27th 2024Stuart Staggs, vice president of transformation and shared services at McKesson, explained that oncology practices in the Enhancing Oncology Model (EOM) have a tough job driving down costs when drug costs make up a larger portion of the total cost of care.
Read More