Amitkumar Mehta, MD, MBA, University of Alabama at Birmingham, notes the long-term data and potential curative effects of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, while expressing optimism about bispecific therapy with ongoing evolution and the chance of significant patient responses.
Amitkumar Mehta, MD, MBA, associate professor of medicine and director of the lymphoma and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy programs, University of Alabama at Birmingham, highlights the synergy between CAR T-cell therapy and bispecifics in oncology.
Mehta delved into the topic more during the panel discussion, "Which Comes First? Bispecifics, CAR T-Cell Therapy, and Cost Consideration in Sequencing," at the Patient-Centered Oncology Care® (PCOC) 2023 meeting.
Transcript
Can you highlight some of the major points from your panel on bispecifics and CAR T-cell therapy?
I don't see CAR T and bispecifics as competing with each other, so they both are, in a way, complementary. Both of them [are] amazing advances in the treatments of oncology, as a matter of fact, and obviously lymphoma and myeloma kind of lead that growth. Now, all the solid tumors are also looking at that technology of bispecific antibody as well as CAR T-cell therapy.
When I look at both the therapies—as a matter of fact, for any therapies—I ask 1 question: whether this therapy can be potentially curative. The way we will know is if we have a longer follow-up and what proportion of patients have not needed treatment after therapy. So that is a key question. The longest data that we have is on CAR T-cell therapy, and as we all know, about 40% to 50% of patients may not need treatment afterwards. Whether we can say that those patients are potentially cured, maybe. That's why CAR T has more long-term data, more robust data in that setting.
Now, bispecific [therapy is] evolving. We are not seeing that proportion of patients staying in remission that long term. But with further follow-up, we might see that maybe some portion of patients [are] not requiring treatment afterwards. But they're also complementary. What I mean by that [is], if you get CAR T-cell therapy and if you progress, still you can get bispecific, and then you will still respond. There is a good bit of chance of response, and so is the other way around.
If you got bispecific and if you progress, then you can get CAR T and still may have a response. They both target different targets. Bispecific targets CD20 and CAR T-cell targets CD19, so that's a unique difference of, so to speak, an attack on the cancer. So they're kind of complementary to each other.
NGS-Based Test Accurately Detects Post–Allo-HSCT Relapse in AML, MDS
February 21st 2025The next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based AlloHeme test accurately predicted relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
Read More
Politics vs Science: The Future of US Public Health
February 4th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Perry N. Halkitis, PhD, MS, MPH, dean of the Rutgers School of Public Health, on the public health implications of the US withdrawal from the World Health Organization and the role of public health leaders in advocating for science and health.
Listen
Adapting ACA Access Amid Medicaid Transition and Policy Reversals: Molly Dean
February 19th 2025As enrollment shifts to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace following the unwinding of Medicaid and the Trump administration begins to implement health policy changes, Molly Dean, MSW, Siftwell's policy advisor, shares insight on how to adapt.
Read More