• Center on Health Equity & Access
  • Clinical
  • Health Care Cost
  • Health Care Delivery
  • Insurance
  • Policy
  • Technology
  • Value-Based Care

COA Expresses Concern With Mandatory Radiation Oncology Model

Article

In response to CMS’ announcement outlining the Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model, the Community Oncology Alliance (COA) has expressed concerns over the model being mandatory or “required” by the agency.

In response to CMS’ announcement outlining the Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model, the Community Oncology Alliance has expressed concerns over the model being mandatory or “required” by the agency. While they note that the model does include a much-needed policy proposal to implement site-neutral payment, they do not support mandatory models.

They add that if models are reasonable and advance value-based care, then voluntary provider participation will be robust and that mandatory models can subject patients with cancer and other serious diseases to disruptions in care that they need and are guaranteed and entitled to under Medicare.

Read the full press release.

Related Videos
Douglas Flora, MD, FACCC
Fred Locke, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Jorge García, PharmD, MS, MBA, MHA, FACHE, FACCC
Rachel Rohaidy, MD
Andrew Kuykendall, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center
Dr Rebecca Haberman
Frederick L. Locke, MD
Screenshot of an interview with Shaun McKenzie, MD
Dr Rebecca Haberman
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences
AJMC®
All rights reserved.