The American Hospital Association (AHA) expressed its opposition to a controversial regulation from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that would purportedly reduce inappropriate hospital admissions.
The American Hospital Association (AHA) expressed its opposition to a controversial regulation from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that would purportedly reduce inappropriate hospital admissions. Otherwise known as the “2-midnight rule,” the regulation aims to reduce the out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries who are placed on extended outpatient observation in hospitals.
Medicare only reimburses the services seniors receive in a skilled-nursing care facility after a 3-day inpatient hospital stay. If they are not admitted as an inpatient, they end up shouldering costs. The CMS-proposed rule for hospital inpatient services aims to clarify which inpatient admissions are reasonable and necessary.
Hospitals sometimes face financial risk when admitting Medicare patients for inpatient stays because Medicare’s recovery auditor contractors (RACs) can later deny them reimbursement.
Ashley Thompson, AHA's senior vice president and deputy director for policy, said that RACs “get a commission on every claim that they deny.” She added, “Hospitals are forced to appeal a massive number of these claims to get paid for medically necessary services. What most people don't realize is that the majority of these appealed claims, about 72%, are overturned by a judge in favor of the hospital.”
Under the new policy, hospital stays shorter than 48 hours are assumed to be legitimate if coded as outpatient observation; stays over “2 midnights” are assumed necessary for patients and billed as inpatient. CMS said that providers should treat Medicare beneficiaries as inpatients if they expect beneficiaries will “require 2 or more midnights of hospital services, and [physicians] should treat most other beneficiaries on an outpatient basis.” While medical necessity will still be taken into account, if a patient’s stay is fewer than 2 midnights, the hospital will be paid on observation status instead of inpatient status.
The regulation also proposes a 0.2% cut to standard inpatient payments for hospitals’ 2014 fiscal year. CMS said this cut will offset the estimated $220 million increase in inpatient expenditures expected to come as a result of the 2-midnight rule.
“They're proposing to offset this by prospectively a 0.2% cut to inpatient payments for 2014 and then stay in the base, so it's a permanent cut,” said Joanna Kim, vice president of payment policy at the AHA. “We strongly oppose that proposal.”
Around the Web
AHA Plans to Fight CMS' '2-Midnight Rule' This Year [Modern Healthcare]
AHA Eyes 'Extremely Challenging' 2014 [Healthcare Leaders Media]
10 Things to Know About the Two-Midnight Rule [Becker's Hospital Review]
More Care Doesn't Equal Happier Patients in Traditional Medicare
March 17th 2025Data on care satisfaction, ease managing care, and out-of-pocket spending were the outcomes of interest for this new analysis that investigated the relationship between healthcare utilization and beneficiary experience within Traditional Medicare.
Read More
Navigating Sport-Related Neurospine Injuries, Surgery, and Managed Care
February 25th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Arthur L. Jenkins III, MD, FACS, CEO of Jenkins NeuroSpine, to explore the intersection of advanced surgical care for sport-related neurospine injuries and managed care systems.
Listen
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen
The Impact of Cost Sharing on High-Value Care
March 14th 2025Michael Chernew, PhD, professor of health care policy and director of the Healthcare Markets and Regulation Lab, Harvard Medical School, shares how cost-sharing policies shape access to critical health care services and influence value-based insurance design.
Read More