Cutting the amount of Monthly Enhanced Oncology Services payments and limiting qualifying tumor types will curtail revenue to practices. But after the financial results in the Oncology Care Model, that's by design.
Panelists discuss the financial fallout from the design of the Enhancing Oncology Model (EOM), which responds to the reports that found the Oncology Care Model succeeded in delivering better care but didn't save enough Medicare enough money in its early years, at least not in practices that were less proficient in operating the model. Kashyap Patel, MD, suggests other payment model programs that could work in tandem with the EOM.
Lack of CD20 Expression Worsens Outcomes for Bispecifics in R/R DLBCL
July 16th 2025Real-world analysis reveals that undetectable CD20 expression worsens outcomes for patients treated with epcoritamab and glofitamab bispecific antibodies for their diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Read More
For Community Oncology, Good News in PFS Offset by Potential Wreckage of MFP Proposal
July 15th 2025CMS proposes the 2026 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS), addressing payment disparities in oncology, but the community oncology community warns of financial threats from the Inflation Reduction Act. Updates reflect late Tuesday release of the proposed 2026 schedule for the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System.
Read More