Among older women with and without breast and ovarian cancers, testing for the BRCA gene dropped precipitously between 2008 and 2018.
Among older women with and without breast cancer and ovarian cancer, testing for the BRCA gene dropped precipitously between 2008 and 2018, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open.
Results from testing for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants help to inform the treatment and prevention of related cancers, with positive findings indicating higher risk, but changing testing criteria likely mean fewer women know these results. The present study investigated the impact of these changes.
A chief finding was the greater likelihood of a BRCA-positive result among women who were non-Hispanic Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04-2.22), living in the West (aOR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.63-4.49) or South (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.14-2.86) regions of the United States, and living in areas with few college graduates (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.10-2.17), as well as those without a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12-1.50).
“The current study evaluates how the rate of documented positive results for BRCA testing changed over time and also evaluates the association between clinical and demographic characteristics and positive test results among US women 65 years of age or older,” the authors noted.
The study population of 5533 women, with a mean age of 68.1 (95% CI, 67.9-68.4) years, were culled from Optum’s Claims-Clinical data set. All received BRCA test results between January 1, 2008, and March 31, 2018. The primary outcome was percentage change in positive BRCA results and how that was affected by race/ethnicity, region of residence, income, educational level, and personal history of breast or ovarian cancer.
Analyses found:
Drops in positive findings were also soon over the 10-year period in the Midwest and Northeast regions, while in the West they increased.
During the study period, most of the women tested were non-Hispanic White (84.6%, n = 4679) and from the Midwest (34.6%; n = 1915). The Optum database their data came from represents more than 91 million lives across all states, and race/ethnicity were self-reported.
“The significantly decreasing rate of positive BRCA test results is evident among women 65 years of age or older, which may be partly explained by loosening of testing criteria during the evaluated time range,” they concluded. “However, socioeconomic and regional disparities were identified and persisted in testing use.”
Future studies should investigate their findings compared with those of women younger than 65, the authors recommended.
Reference
Fangjian G, School M, Fuchs EL, Wong R, Yong-Fang K, Berenson AB. Trends in positive BRCA test results among older women in the United States, 2008-2018. JAMA Netw Open. Published online November 5, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24358
AI in Health Care: Closing the Revenue Cycle Gap
April 1st 2025This commentary explores the current state, challenges, and potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care revenue cycle management, emphasizing collaboration, data standardization, and targeted implementation to enhance adoption.
Read More
Managed Care Reflections: A Q&A With Hoangmai H. Pham, MD, MPH
April 1st 2025To mark the 30th anniversary of The American Journal of Managed Care® (AJMC®), each issue in 2025 will include a special feature: reflections from a thought leader on what has changed—and what has not—over the past 3 decades and what’s next for managed care. The April issue features a conversation with Hoangmai H. Pham, MD, MPH, a member of AJMC’s editorial board and the president and CEO of the Institute for Exceptional Care (IEC).
Read More
Bridging Care Gaps With a Systemwide Value-Based Care Strategy
March 29th 2025Mapping care management needs by defining patient populations and then stratifying them according to risk and their needs can help to spur the transformation of a siloed health care system into an integrated system that is able to better provide holistic, value-based care despite the many transitions that continue among hospital, primary, specialty, and community care environments.
Read More