Even after adjustments, the underlying trends in disparities persisted, underscoring the significance of survival disparities among second primary cancer survivors.
Data published in JAMA Network Open revealed striking differences in cancer-related and cardiovascular-related deaths across different racial and ethnic groups.1
In a recent cohort study involving individuals diagnosed with second primary cancers (SPCs), investigators shed light on concerning racial and ethnic disparities in survival rates within the United States. The study sought to fill a significant gap in knowledge regarding such disparities, by utilizing extensive data from 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries covering January 2000 to December 2013, with follow-up extending until December 2018.
Hyuna Sung, PhD, Surveillance & Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, and the team of investigators conducted the population-based retrospective cohort study, which evaluated the survival outcomes of more than 230,000 individuals aged 20 years or older who had been diagnosed with common SPCs.
The study's objective was to assess the disparities in survival between various racial and ethnic groups. The data, analyzed between January and April 2023, exposed critical discrepancies in survival rates among different populations.
Results showed 58.4% of the study population was male, 4.5% were Asian or Pacific Islander, 9.6% were Black, 6.4% were Hispanic, and 79.5% were White. Investigators reported that a total of 109,757 cancer-related deaths (47.6%) and 18,283 CVD-related deaths (7.9%) occurred during the median follow-up of 54 months (IQR, 12-93 months).
Among the cohort of SPC survivors, the data demonstrated that disparities in survival outcomes were starkly evident across racial and ethnic lines.
Compared with the White population, the Black (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.18-1.23) and Hispanic populations (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13) faced a significantly higher risk of cancer-related deaths. Additionally, the Black population exhibited a higher risk of cardiovascular-related deaths (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.34-1.49), while the Asian or Pacific Islander (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81) and Hispanic populations displayed a lower risk (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96).
When stratified by specific SPC types, the findings remained consistent. Investigators noted the Black population showed higher risks of cancer-related death for 10 of 13 SPC types, with uterine cancer standing out as a particularly prominent example (HR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.63-2.15). The Hispanic population exhibited a higher risk of cancer-related death for 7 specific SPCs, including melanoma (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.21-1.76).
The team further investigated the impact of potentially modifiable factors on survival disparities. Adjustments for county attributes, SPC characteristics, and treatment reduced the HR for both cancer-related and cardiovascular-related deaths. However, the underlying trends in disparities persisted, underscoring the significance of these findings in addressing and rectifying the survival disparities among SPC survivors.
“In this diverse, contemporary, population-based cohort study of 230,370 persons with SPCs, the Black and Hispanic populations compared with the White population had a higher risk of cancer-related death, with the greatest disparities commonly observed for persons with SPCs of the breast and corpus uteri and melanoma,” investigators wrote. “The Black population also experienced the greatest risk of death from CVD of all populations overall and across most SPCs.”
References
1. Sung H, Nisotel L, Sedeta E, Islami F, Jemal A. Racial and ethnic disparities in survival among people with second primary cancer in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(8):e2327429. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27429
AI in Health Care: Closing the Revenue Cycle Gap
April 1st 2025This commentary explores the current state, challenges, and potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care revenue cycle management, emphasizing collaboration, data standardization, and targeted implementation to enhance adoption.
Read More
Managed Care Reflections: A Q&A With Hoangmai H. Pham, MD, MPH
April 1st 2025To mark the 30th anniversary of The American Journal of Managed Care® (AJMC®), each issue in 2025 will include a special feature: reflections from a thought leader on what has changed—and what has not—over the past 3 decades and what’s next for managed care. The April issue features a conversation with Hoangmai H. Pham, MD, MPH, a member of AJMC’s editorial board and the president and CEO of the Institute for Exceptional Care (IEC).
Read More
Bridging Care Gaps With a Systemwide Value-Based Care Strategy
March 29th 2025Mapping care management needs by defining patient populations and then stratifying them according to risk and their needs can help to spur the transformation of a siloed health care system into an integrated system that is able to better provide holistic, value-based care despite the many transitions that continue among hospital, primary, specialty, and community care environments.
Read More