American College of Cardiology 2014
Metformin, the go-to drug for patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), may help control glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels, but according to a new study from the Netherlands, metformin does not help prevent heart failure in patients who have had a heart attack and do not have T2DM.1
The study was presented March 31, 2014, at the final late-breaking session of the 63rd Scientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology (ACC), held in Washington, DC. It answered a question that some researchers have wondered about, given that some studies have suggested that metformin’s protective effects go beyond its ability to lower glucose levels.
Although the session was jointly sponsored by the ACC and the New England Journal of Medicine, the metformin study was simultaneously published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.1
Lead author and presenter Chris P.H. Lexis, MD, of the University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands, said the study was designed to find out whether metformin would benefit patients who had suffered a heart attack but who would not be candidates for metformin because they did not have diabetes. Animal studies had shown that metformin preserved the ability of the heart to pump blood through the body after myocardial infarction (MI), which left researchers wondering if the same was true in humans. If so, metformin could be prescribed for patients who have had a heart attack to prevent heart failure after an MI.
In the study, 380 patients who had experienced an MI and had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomized to receive either 500 mg of metformin twice daily or placebo, in addition to normal standard of care. Patients who had already received a diagnosis of T2DM or who were coronary bypass candidates were excluded. The median age of patients was 59 years.
The primary end point of the study was left ventricular ejection fraction, a measurement that describes the percentage of blood leaving the heart each time it contracts. This measure is key after MI, which can reduce the left ventricle’s ability to pump blood through the body. The measurement was taken by magnetic resonance imaging, 4 months after each patient’s MI. Results showed that the metformin group’s fraction was 53.1%, compared with 54.8% for the placebo group, which Lexis said was not statistically significant.
EBDM
References
1. Lexis CPH, Iwan CC, van der Horst EL, et al. Effect of metformin on left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction in patients without diabetes: the GIPS-III randomized clinical trial [published online March 31, 2014]. JAMA.
2. Metformin fails to reduce heart failure after heart attack [press release]. Washington, DC: American College of Cardiology; March 31, 2014. http://acc2014.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/LEXIS_GIPSIII_LBCT-NEJM_Press-Release_FINAL.pdf.
Lexis said that while the results will not change clinical practice for patients without diabetes, they do show that metformin is safe for patients who have suffered ST-elevated myocardial infarction, or STEMI. “It is noteworthy that metformin started early after heart attack did not adversely affect kidney function and was well tolerated,” he said. So, our findings do not preclude the use of metformin to treat diabetes in this setting.”2
Intensive Blood Pressure Regimen Lowers CVD Risk for People With Diabetes
November 19th 2024Reducing systolic blood pressure to less than 120 mmHg lowered the risk of major cardiovascular events for most people with type 2 diabetes in the Blood Pressure Control Target in Diabetes trial.
Read More
Exploring Pharmaceutical Innovations, Trust, and Access With CVS Health's CMO
July 11th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the chief medical officer of CVS Health about recent pharmaceutical innovations, patient-provider relationships, and strategies to reduce drug costs.
Listen
How Can Employers Leverage the DPP to Improve Diabetes Rates?
February 15th 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Jill Hutt, vice president of member services at the Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health, explains the Coalition’s efforts to reduce diabetes rates through the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).
Listen
How English- and Spanish-Preferring Patients With Cancer Decide on Emergency Care
November 13th 2024Care delivery innovations to help patients with cancer avoid emergency department visits are underused. The authors interviewed English- and Spanish-preferring patients at 2 diverse health systems to understand why.
Read More
Geographic Variations and Facility Determinants of Acute Care Utilization and Spending for ACSCs
November 12th 2024Emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations for ambulatory care–sensitive conditions (ACSCs) among Medicaid patients constitute almost 40% of all ED visits and hospitalizations, with lower rates observed in areas with greater proximity to urgent care facilities and density of rural health clinics.
Read More