Neil B. Minkoff, MD: We’ve talked a fair amount about the different challenges to the patient in terms of getting access, and 2 hour drives to get monitoring, and so on. But from a provider perspective, what are some of the challenges that you’re facing in terms of managing or maintaining patients with SCD [sickle cell disease]?
Ahmar U. Zaidi, MD: I think for a long time, the issue has been lack of therapies. We have had hydroxyurea and blood transfusions for a disease that we’ve known about since 1910. And the problem is really the toolbox. We haven’t had tools in the toolbox to help us deal with patients. And thankfully we’re moving into the dawn of a new era where our toolbox is going to be replete with tools.
Neil B. Minkoff, MD: Hold that thought.
Ahmar U. Zaidi, MD: Sure.
Neil B. Minkoff, MD: From the payer point of view, what are the challenges you’re facing when it comes to maybe even identifying as well as helping to maintain a quality of life or the health of these patients?
John C. Stancil, RPh: I think the way we approach drug costs—because there are certainly very expensive gene therapies that are coming and are going to be impacting our budgets—is that we see the offset of the higher cost of hospitalizations and medical costs if we do allow access to those drug therapies. Again, most of these childhood diseases are very individualized in their approach, and so we don’t want to put restrictions to access to the provider or have the provider have to jump through hoops if they know this is the best choice or the best treatment option for that patient. We’re very collaborative with our provider groups, and try to partner with them on the standards of care that they want to implement within their institutions or centers of excellence.
Maria Lopes, MD, MS: I do think that there needs to be guidelines. There does need to be a standard without a doubt, as we think about gene therapy, and we now have 2 on the market. But we really are seriously wanting to know and understand what the durability of the effect is. Who are the good candidates for these gene therapies that promise innovation like no other in terms of a cure? But what happens if it isn’t? These patients still need to be monitored, they still need to be tracked, they still need to be followed. Most payers, especially in Medicaid, have such high churn that the issue of affordability and how we’re going to finance this gets us into innovative payment models that lead to some accountability for the pharmaceutical industry, the need for data and tracking to make sure these really are the cures that we all anticipate and value.
EHA Plenary Abstracts Zoom in From Investigational Drugs to Molecular Signatures
June 14th 2025Abstracts presented during the plenary session of the 2025 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress spanned from novel drug regimens for myeloma and lymphoma to investigation of leukemias on the molecular and genetic levels.
Read More
COVID-19 Deaths Cloud Interpretation of Acalabrutinib-Venetoclax Combo Results
June 13th 2025A combination of acalabrutinib and venetoclax showed better results with the addition of obinutuzumab, whereas mixed findings in a cross-trial comparison were complicated by the inclusion of deaths related to COVID-19.
Read More
Measurable Residual Disease in Decision-Making: An Opportunity, but Not a Promise
June 13th 2025Skepticism still persists around the use of measurable residual disease (MRD) for clinical and regulatory decision-making in the European context, but panelists explained the next steps that are required to advance the use of MRD.
Read More