- Center on Health Equity & Access
- Clinical
- Health Care Cost
- Health Care Delivery
- Insurance
- Policy
- Technology
- Value-Based Care
Failure to demonstrate an impact of computerized physician order entry embedded reminders
TO THE EDITORSThe article by Palen et al, in the July issue of The American Journal of Managed Care, which failed to demonstrate an impact of CPOE embedded reminders, was disappointing but not surprising.1 In this study, nonintrusive reminders for recommended laboratory monitoring were provided. There was no difference between the control and intervention group, as the results were dismal in each. Providers in both groups failed to order recommended laboratory tests almost half the time. Of the potential reasons offered for the failure of the intervention, none address the primary motivators in determining physician behavior. It is commonly accepted that physicians respond to 2 primary motivators–comparison to peers and financial gain. If the goal is adherence to recommended laboratory monitoring or other guidelines, a more effective adoption strategy would include prominently displaying compliance rates and attaching meaningful compensation to achieving desired outcomes.
Michael Patmas, MDMedical Director & VP of Medical Affairs
2650 Courtney Dr
E-mail: mpatmas@coihs.com
Reference
We agree with Dr. Patmas that "pay-for-performance" and peer comparisons are techniques that have proved useful in modifying physician behavior in practice. The peer comparison is a tool we currently use in our organization to show how clinical departments and individual physicians "perform" in comparison to their peers. However, the purpose of the current study was not to investigate how peer comparisons or "pay-for-performance" incentives can change physician behavior, but rather to evaluate the effectiveness of nonintrusive instructions / alerts within a computer physician order entry system at the point of care. We felt that adding an additional incentive program would introduce a second variable into the study design that could influence the results, thus making it difficult to interpret the impact of our primary intervention–introduction of noninstrusive alerts.
Ted E. Palen, MD, PhD, MSPHClinical Research UnitColorado Permanente Medical Group
E-mail: ted.e.palen@kp.org
High-Risk Care Management Impact on Medicaid ACO Utilization and Spending
July 10th 2025In Massachusetts’ largest Medicaid accountable care organization (ACO), high-risk care management significantly reduced spending, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations, demonstrating that targeted strategies can manage health care costs amid budget constraints.
Read More
Corticosteroid Premedication for Infliximab Remains Unnecessarily Common
July 8th 2025Although use of corticosteroid premedication prior to infliximab infusions is declining, it remains unnecessarily high despite limited benefit and the risk of serious adverse events from corticosteroids.
Read More
Managed Care Reflections: A Q&A With David J. Shulkin, MD
July 7th 2025To mark the 30th anniversary of The American Journal of Managed Care (AJMC), each issue in 2025 includes a special feature: reflections from a thought leader on what has changed—and what has not—over the past 3 decades and what’s next for managed care. The July issue features a conversation with David J. Shulkin, MD, a physician and former secretary of the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
Read More
