Researchers from MD Anderson Cancer Center found that laparoscopy cost more upfront but eliminated wasteful treatment decisions.
A cost-effective analysis has shown that using laparoscopy to guide the initial treatment plan for patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer is cost-effective for health care payers. Results were published in the journal Gynecologic Oncology.
The analysis was designed to show whether using laparoscopy would be useful in deciding between 2 surgical approaches: the more aggressive primary cytoreduction (PCS) and the less invasive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval cytoreduction (NACT), based on the likelihood of complete gross resection.
Researchers from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center used a microsimulation model that included the elements of a more conventional decision making process to compare with laparoscopy. The model included diagnostic work-ups, surgical and adjuvant treatment, complications, and progression-free survival (PFS), with parameters developed based on published literature and investigators’ own data.
Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted PFS years and tested with a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). A willingness-to-pay level was set at $50,000 year per year for each year of quality adjusted PFS.
The laparoscopy cost more upfront but was also more effective in guiding treatment. The average additional cost of $7034 led to an average additional 4.1 months of quality-adjusted PFS. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the procedure was $20,376 per year of PFS, well below the threshold. Using the procedure ahead of treatment decisions helped avoid other serious complications and added costs, and researchers reported that laparoscopy was “cost-effective across a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds.”
The authors concluded, “Performing laparoscopy is a cost-effective way to improve primary treatment planning for patients with untreated advanced ovarian cancer.”
Reference
Harrison RF, Cantor SB, Sun CC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic disease assessment in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. Published online January 31, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.024.
Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Linked to Preoperative Immunonutritional Status
February 18th 2025In patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, a high prognostic nutritional index improved survival, while a high systemic immune-inflammation index worsened it. In advanced stages, both affected overall survival but not progression-free survival.
Read More
Physician Gaps in Genetic Testing Knowledge May Impact Ovarian Cancer Care
February 5th 2025While genetic testing rates for advanced ovarian cancer have increased, gaps in physician understanding and confidence in interpreting results may limit optimal biomarker-driven treatment and patient access to genetic counseling.
Read More
Olaparib Leads PARP Inhibitors in Boosting OS for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
February 3rd 2025While all poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors improved progression-free survival, olaparib significantly extended overall survival (OS), making it a preferred option.
Read More
Niraparib Extends PFS, Time to Next Treatment in Patients With EOC, Especially BRCA-Mutated Cases
January 28th 2025First-line maintenance (1LM) niraparib significantly extends progression-free survival (rwPFS) and time to next treatment (rwTTNT) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), with the greatest benefit observed in those considered homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) and those with BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) tumors.
Read More