TO THE EDITORS:
The
American Journal of Managed Care
The article titled "Impact of Copays in Vulnerable Populations" on the November supplement of makes an important contribution to the literature through thecomprehensive review of the healthcare experiences of a wide range of different vulnerable populationsand their sensitivity to increasing copayments.1 This review describes the experiences of thepoor, the uninsured, the chronically ill, the elderly, the mentally ill, and others. What is missing fromthis review, however, is a reflection that these vulnerable groups overlap considerably (eg, the elderlyare more likely to be chronically ill and also be poor), and that their experiences are likely toreflect the multiple risk factors that they experience. It is likely that increasing cost sharing mayhave exaggerated effects on prescription filling and use among those who are both elderly and poor.
Such overlap of populations is nothing new, but rarely do we as researchers explicitly recognizethe concomitant and potentially combinatorial effects of risk factors, such as poverty and lack ofinsurance. Shi and Stevens are only among the latest to argue that we view most vulnerable populationsby the collection of health or healthcare risk factors they possess, and work harder to understandtheir interactivity.2 Previous studies have indeed counted the number of risk factors a personhas and have shown clear gradients in health services use, quality of care, and health status.3-5 At itssimplest and arguably finest, however, the vulnerability construct can be measured by examiningthose with multiple risk factors versus 1 or none (as the authors smartly did in reviewing the experiencesof dual eligibles for Medicare and Medicaid).
The general lack of discussion concerning multiple risk factors from the review is not the fault ofthe authors, as it is something that has been missing almost entirely from the literature that was availablefor review. While each of the studies reviewed fills an important gap in knowledge, it is time thatwe begin to rethink vulnerable populations as comprehensive wholes, not as just distinct categories,however a difficult challenge. Researchers must identify strategies to comprehensively measure vulnerablepopulations; administrators need to be flexible enough to design or modify programs toaccount for multiple, overlapping risks; and practitioners need information and tools for how to servepatients who have multiple risks or comorbidities.
The supplement article provides an important first step because it effectively defines the range ofresearch knowledge on the experiences of many different vulnerable groups. The next important stepis to reassemble this information and recognize that in pharmacy and clinic practice, as elsewhere,vulnerability is considerably more than the sum of its parts.
Gregory D. Stevens, PhD
Assistant Professor of Research
University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine
Alhambra, California
Am J Manag Care.
1. Impact of copays on vulnerable populations. 2006;12(13 suppl):S359-S363.
Vulnerable Populations in the United States.
2. Shi L, Stevens GD. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2005.
Health Serv Res.
3. Stevens GD, Seid M, Mistry R, Halfon N. Disparities in primary care for vulnerable children: the influence of multiplerisk factors. 2006;41:507-531.
J Gen Intern
Med.
4. Shi L, Stevens GD. Vulnerability and unmet health care needs. The influence of multiple risk factors. 2005;20:148-154.
Med Care.
5. Shi L, Stevens GD. Vulnerability and the receipt of recommended preventive services: the influence of multiplerisk factors. 2005;43:193-198.
AI in Health Care: Closing the Revenue Cycle Gap
April 1st 2025This commentary explores the current state, challenges, and potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care revenue cycle management, emphasizing collaboration, data standardization, and targeted implementation to enhance adoption.
Read More
Managed Care Reflections: A Q&A With Hoangmai H. Pham, MD, MPH
April 1st 2025To mark the 30th anniversary of The American Journal of Managed Care® (AJMC®), each issue in 2025 will include a special feature: reflections from a thought leader on what has changed—and what has not—over the past 3 decades and what’s next for managed care. The April issue features a conversation with Hoangmai H. Pham, MD, MPH, a member of AJMC’s editorial board and the president and CEO of the Institute for Exceptional Care (IEC).
Read More
Value-Based Care Is Key to Bringing Cardiology Breakthroughs to Those Who Will Benefit Most
March 13th 2025On December 10, 2024, cardiologists, researchers, and value-based care experts gathered in Dallas, Texas, to discuss best practices for implementing advances in cardiology care with a value-based mindset, spanning the care continuum from prevention to treatment.
Read More