So far, the recent failure of a high-profile bundled payment pilot in California has not slowed enthusiasm for the concept from CMS.
In August, the RAND Corporation reported that a second major pilot study of bundled payments had failed. The news sent healthcare reform advocates looking for answers and brought out the critics.
A recent critique, appearing online in Forbes, called bundled payments “price controls by another name” and pointed out potential problems with the concept: incentives to skimp on care, or, conversely, “upcoding” to get more from Medicare if a patient’s condition is marginal or uncertain.
However, as The American Journal of Managed Care reported in July, CMS wants to expand its bundled payment program and anticipated an uptick in the number of healthcare organizations taking part. So far, there appears to be no backtracking from CMS on bundled payments, which are seen as a way to bring savings to government-funded healthcare.
What accounts for the disconnect? Some labeled the particular features of the failed pilot in California, administered by Integrated Healthcare Associates, as “no risk, no reward,” and others pointed to the uniquely difficult features of the state’s regulatory environment. Uncertainty clearly seemed to be a factor in provider dropouts, with hospitals saying they were unwilling to make the administrative or technical investment needed if there was no guarantee of a return.
Both the RAND authors and some of their critics observed that success can come from failure. For example, one commentator observed that payments should start in a retrospective model, then move to a prospective model.
As Jan E. Berger, MD, MJ, wrote in The American Journal of Pharmacy Benefits in June, “We are in a sort of ‘experimental phase’ with many of these new models, and we will not have all the answers from the start.
“What we do need to have is inquisitiveness, transparency, and the willingness to work together to address these issues openly in a way that leads us over time to the best method of meeting the goals of a bundled-payment model.”
Around the Web
Bundled Payment: Learning From Our Failures
The Bungling of Bundled Payments
AJMC: More Providers Opt for Bundled Payments
A Bundle of Joy: How Does the Trend of Bundled Payment Affect the Pharmacy Benefit?
Trump Administration’s Message to Supreme Court Puts New Wrinkle in Braidwood Case
February 21st 2025The Trump administration argues that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr can overrule the US Preventive Services Task Force to determine the preventive services covered under the Affordable Care Act.
Read More
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen
5 Key Health Care Moments During President Trump's First Month Back in Office
February 21st 2025President Donald J. Trump pushed for significant health care changes during his first month back in office, through executive orders affecting managed care, drug pricing, and clinical trial diversity guidance.
Read More
Same-Day Breast Imaging Gaps Reveal Health Care Disparities
February 18th 2025For this retrospective study, the authors examined data on more than 3 million screening mammographies for more than 1 million female patients; of the screenings, 23.6% had abnormal results and only 6.7% were recommended for biopsy.
Read More