• Center on Health Equity & Access
  • Clinical
  • Health Care Cost
  • Health Care Delivery
  • Insurance
  • Policy
  • Technology
  • Value-Based Care

In-Network Sites Offer Biggest Outpatient Surgery Savings for Patients: Xiaoxi Zhao, PhD

Commentary
Video

Patients save most on outpatient surgeries at in-network sites, so Xiaoxi Zhao, PhD, emphasizes that transparency could help them make better cost choices.

Xiaoxi Zhao, PhD, continues her conversation with The American Journal of Managed Care® by expanding on findings from her October 2025 study, "Pricing and Insurance Networks in Outpatient Surgery Markets."

She explains that out-of-network ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) often cost less than in-network hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) due to lower overhead and limited bargaining power, but patients tend to save more at in-network sites. Zhao emphasizes that improved transparency could help patients make more cost-conscious choices.

Watch part 1 for an overview of the study's background and key findings.

Transcript

Your study found that out-of-network ASCs often cost less than in-network HOPDs. Why do you think this occurs?

I think it really comes down to 2 things. The first one is the cost structure, because ASCs are more specialized in routine procedures and relatively low-complexity procedures. Because ASCs are more focused, they can have linear staffing and don't need to carry the large overhead cost that a hospital may need to carry.

The second thing is, when you think about prices, it's always related to market power. Large hospital systems always have a larger bargaining power. During the price negotiation against the insurance companies, they could leverage their base rate, even if they are in-network.

For ASCs, especially independent ASCs, they have very little bargaining power. During the price negotiation process, they may have to lower their rates, which leads to a tighter margin for them.

Can you explain why insurers save more with ASC usage, while patients save more by using in-network facilities?

This is a question that my colleagues and I are also thinking about right now. I think the most straightforward explanation is that it is how the current plan design, or benefit design, is.

Also, I think, from a patient's perspective, it's harder for them to identify whether they are going to an ASC or HOPD, especially an off-campus HOPD. They may not be able to choose among them and may be less aware of the price difference between the 2 different sites.

I think there's an information gap. The information gap is something that is relatively cheap to fill, and I think that could help a lot of patients understand the price difference between the 2 sites. It helps lead people to make a better choice, from their perspective.

Related Videos
Ivo Carre, PhD
Andrew Evens, DO, MBA, MSc, deputy director for clinical services and chief physician officer, Rutgers Cancer Institute
Ivo Carre, PhD, senior business analyst, Lifescience Dynamics
Antonio Urbina, MD
Dr Jennifer Graff, Dr Joey Mattinly, and Brian Reid Dr Jennifer Graff and Brian Reid | Background image credit: ipopba - stock.adobe.com
4 Experts are featured in this series
4 Experts are featured in this series
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences
AJMC®
All rights reserved.