Financial considerations associated with heart failure management are dissected.
This is a video synopsis/summary of a panel discussion involving Robert Groves, MD; Eugene E. Wright Jr, MD; Nancy Albert, PhD, CCNS, CCRN, CHFN, NE-BC, FAHA, FCCM, FHFSA, FAAN; Nihar Desai, MD, MPH; and Kelly Marie Axsom, MD. The panel highlights cost as a major barrier to heart failure care, which affects access to medications and effective treatment. Even patients with insurance struggle with copays. Albert notes her center uses pharmacists to assist with prior authorizations and patient assistance programs for free medications, but this requires extensive time and resources. Individual providers cannot reasonably handle this alone. Wright stresses that creative solutions are possible with proper infrastructure and support teams. Desai discusses an analysis finding heart failure quadruple therapy costs Medicare beneficiaries more than $2200 out of pocket, which is likely unaffordable for many. Despite reducing hospitalizations and total costs, high out-of-pocket costs limit access to life-changing therapies. Policy changes are needed, such as the Inflation Reduction Act’s provisions for some cardiovascular medications. In summary, the panel emphasizes that addressing cost barriers will require both system-level changes and support for individual provider efforts to ensure evidence-based heart failure care is financially accessible.
Video synopsis is AI-generated and reviewed by AJMC editorial staff.
EHA Plenary Abstracts Zoom in From Investigational Drugs to Molecular Signatures
June 14th 2025Abstracts presented during the plenary session of the 2025 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress spanned from novel drug regimens for myeloma and lymphoma to investigation of leukemias on the molecular and genetic levels.
Read More
COVID-19 Deaths Cloud Interpretation of Acalabrutinib-Venetoclax Combo Results
June 13th 2025A combination of acalabrutinib and venetoclax showed better results with the addition of obinutuzumab, whereas mixed findings in a cross-trial comparison were complicated by the inclusion of deaths related to COVID-19.
Read More
Measurable Residual Disease in Decision-Making: An Opportunity, but Not a Promise
June 13th 2025Skepticism still persists around the use of measurable residual disease (MRD) for clinical and regulatory decision-making in the European context, but panelists explained the next steps that are required to advance the use of MRD.
Read More