Specialty Area
Spotlight
Topics
Institute for Value-Based Medicine
About AJMC
Podcasts
CE
Subscribe
- Center on Health Equity & Access
- Clinical
- Health Care Cost
- Health Care Delivery
- Insurance
- Policy
- Technology
- Value-Based Care
Factoring in Safety Considerations With IV Iron Products
Panelists discuss how black box warnings on IV iron products, particularly regarding hypersensitivity reactions, influence their risk assessment, patient selection, monitoring protocols, and facility requirements for administration, while emphasizing that modern formulations have significantly improved safety profiles compared with older products.
EP: 1.Background and Causes of Iron Deficiency Anemia
EP: 2.Pathophysiology of Iron Deficiency Anemia
EP: 3.Symptoms and Epidemiology of Iron Deficiency Anemia
EP: 4.Diagnosis and Common Comorbidities Seen With Iron Deficiency Anemia
EP: 5.Monitoring Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia After Diagnosis
EP: 6.Oral vs IV Iron in Clinical Practice
EP: 7.FDA-Approved IV Iron Formulations
Now Viewing
EP: 8.Factoring in Safety Considerations With IV Iron Products
EP: 9.Adverse Effects Associated With Hypophosphatemia
EP: 10.Clinical Impact of Hypophosphatemia
EP: 11.Clinical and Economic Consequences of Nonadherence to IV Iron
EP: 12.Adherence and Time Spent Receiving IV Iron Infusions
EP: 13.Step Edits Associated with IV Iron Therapies
EP: 14.The Future of IV Iron Administration
EP: 15.Closing Thoughts on Iron Deficiency Anemia
Video content above is prompted by the following:
- How does the presence of a black box warning on certain IV iron products influence your clinical decision-making process?
Related Content
In VERIFY, Rusfertide Spares Most Patients With PV a Phlebotomy for 32 Weeks, Improves QOL
June 3rd 2025Article
Adding rusfertide to standard of care more than doubled the share of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who did not meet criteria for a phlebotomy, according to data from the VERIFY trial.
Read More
