Vamshi Rao, MD, attending physician of Neurology at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago discusses how the pandemic has impacted access to spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treatments.
Vamshi Rao, MD, is an attending physician of Neurology at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and assistant professor of Pediatrics (Neurology and Epilepsy) at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Transcript:
Has the COVID-19 [coronavirus disease 2019] pandemic impacted access to either newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy [SMA] type 1 or to treatments?
Rao: We've been very fortunate that COVID-19 overall has not impacted the access to treatments and newborn screening. I can speak for the state of Illinois because that is where I practice. Newborn screening was introduced as a pilot somewhere between May and July 2020 and rapidly took over as a permanent program after that. All of the children that are being born in the state of Illinois are definitely going through newborn screening and COVID-19 has not affected that. As far as access to treatment, access to treatment at a particular institution for a therapy that requires children to come to the hospital, such as Spinraza [nusinersen] that is given through lumbar puncture, or on a *17 hour power glycosyltransferase* that is given through IV [intravenous injection] requires children to come to the hospital.
Guidelines that required COVID-19 precautions were in place in most people places, and guidelines have to be practiced. But at the same time, a very risk-benefit analysis was done in terms of exposure vs children getting treatment and I'm happy to say that, at least at our institution, as we really looked at these guidelines [with] a committee that was formed to assess whether children were going to come in for their regular treatments, and clinical trials, it was found that the risk of not getting the medication vs the risk of getting COVID was definitely in favor of decline with the underlying estimate if they did not get their medication. So all these children were allowed to have their disease modifying therapies given to them at our hospital.
I definitely think that access was affected at some institutions and I do think access was affected around the country, in places where a lot of travel was involved in whether kids were coming from rural communities, or coming from very far off, mountainous regions to their nearest center that was giving them these drugs. Overall, I do think there were places that where access was affected, but as an SMA community, our goal was to always administer the drug despite all odds, of course, keeping all the safety and precautions in place.
New Insights Into Meth-Associated PAH Care Gaps: Anjali Vaidya, MD, on Closing the Divide
June 4th 2025Research from Anjali Vaidya, MD, FACC, FASE, FACP, Temple University Hospital, reveals critical care gaps for patients with methamphetamine-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and integrated support.
Read More
Laundromats as a New Frontier in Community Health, Medicaid Outreach
May 29th 2025Lindsey Leininger, PhD, and Allister Chang, MPA, highlight the potential of laundromats as accessible, community-based settings to support Medicaid outreach, foster trust, and connect families with essential health and social services.
Listen
Tailored Dosing for MM Matters More Than Drug Count: Ajai Chari, MD
April 25th 2025When it comes to treating multiple myeloma (MM), Ajai Chari, MD, argued that more is not always better. More intense treatment regimens, or those with more drugs, don't necessarily guarantee better outcomes.
Read More
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More