A recent study looked to use real-world data to support the value of pathway regimens designed to create high-quality, affordable treatment in breast cancer care.
A recent study looked to use real-world data to support the value of pathway regimens designed to create high-quality, affordable treatment in breast cancer care.
Oncology practices have developed or adopted evidence-based treatment guidelines as one mechanism for implementing clinical value frameworks. Despite the potential of these programs, there remains a lack of evidence to support their value. Researchers used nationally representative claims data from Anthem, combined with clinical data from its Cancer Care Quality Program, and identified patients with breast cancer for whom chemotherapy was initiated between January 2015 and October 2016.
Patients receiving a pathway regimen (identified as the on-pathway cohort) were matched to those who did not (referred to as the off-pathway cohort) using a 1:1 match. The study compared quality of care outcomes, including hospitalization, emergency department (ED) visits, a patient need for supportive drugs, and cost outcomes, between the cohorts after 6 months post treatment.
In total, each cohort enrolled 959 patients. The age distribution in each cohort was similar; the median age was 52 years in the off-pathway cohort versus 53 years in the on-pathway cohort. The 2 cohorts had similar hospitalization and EDt visit rates, however, supportive care drugs were used significantly less often in the on-pathway cohort (72.5% in the on-pathway cohort vs 82.8% in the off-pathway cohort; odds ratio, 0.55; P ≤.0001). Importantly, the average cost of care was $16,176 lower in the on-pathway cohort (95% CI, —$24,291 to –$8061; P ≤.0001).
“Our main finding was that treatment of patients with breast cancer with on-pathway regimens was associated with a reduction in cost without compromising quality of care as evident by comparable rates of hospitalization and ED visits and less use of supportive drugs,” said the study authors. In terms of future research, the authors noted that opportunities include evaluating provider factors associated with the selection of off-pathway regimens, surveys of patient and provider experience, and long-term measures of pathway effectiveness.
Reference
Gautam S, Sylwestrzak G, Barron J, et al. Results from a health insurer’s clinical pathway program in breast cancer [published online October 15, 2018]. J Oncol Pract. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00157.
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Community Engagement, Culturally Tailored Care as a Gateway to Advancing Health Equity
October 16th 2024Many talks at the Association of Cancer Care Centers (ACCC) 41st National Oncology Conference advocated for the adoption of culturally relevant care, the leveraging of community partnerships, and community engagement to build better trust with patients and improve outcomes.
Read More
Combatting Misconceptions of Clinical Trials to Improve Patient Participation
October 16th 2024There are many misconceptions patients might have about clinical trials that prevent them from participating, and it’s important to understand what they are in order to overcome them, said Terry L. Keys, of University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center.
Read More