Over time, biosimilars are gaining traction in the US and becoming preferred products, explained James D. Chambers, PhD, of Tufts Medical Center.
Early in a biosimilar’s life cycle, it can be challenging to gain a foothold, but over time biosimilars are gaining traction and becoming preferred products, said James D. Chambers, PhD, professor, Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center.
This transcript has been lightly edited for clarity.
Transcript
Considering safety and efficacy is the same, but the cost is cheaper, why wouldn't a payer prefer a biosimilar over the originator product on formulary?
I think, historically, there's been some reticence about biosimilars and, are they truly equivalent? We talked about interchangeability and so on. I don't think that is the same concern now as it once was. I don't think that really is a factor. I think that what you maybe getting towards here are some of the rebate rules and some of the negotiations, and what's the net price and the rebate? Who gets the benefit from the magnitude of the rebate? And so on. And the incentive to put a higher list price so that you can offer larger discount and so on, obfuscates things, confuses things, and I think that that could be a challenge.
My research certainly suggests, though, that even given that the biosimilars have increasingly become preferred amongst payers. While that may be a hurdle at the beginning and be very obstructive at the beginning of a drug's life cycle, over time, it does seem as if the biosimilars are gaining traction and getting the foothold in the market and often becoming the preferred product in some cases.
While in some ways you could argue that the system is against the new biosimilar entry, over time, it is gaining traction, it is getting a foothold. It is hard to understand those complicated rules, exactly where the money goes, and the system is opaque, and it's hard to figure out. But from a good news perspective, our data does show that over time, biosimilars are becoming more successful and gaining market share, so that is a good thing.
Navigating Sport-Related Neurospine Injuries, Surgery, and Managed Care
February 25th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with Arthur L. Jenkins III, MD, FACS, CEO of Jenkins NeuroSpine, to explore the intersection of advanced surgical care for sport-related neurospine injuries and managed care systems.
Listen
How Access to SMA Treatment Varies Globally and by Insurance Type
March 18th 2025Posters presented at the 2025 Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) Clinical & Scientific Conference show that therapeutic advances in treating spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are not uniformly making it into the hands of patients who could benefit.
Read More
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen
How Mirdametinib Improves QOL for People With NF1-Associated Plexiform Neurofibromas
March 18th 2025Christopher L. Moertel, MD, University of Minnesota, discusses the trial data that helped get mirdametinib approved and what providers can do to keep measuring quality of life (QOL) improvements.
Read More