Experts examine the economic burdens on the health care system, payers, and patients, based on associated costs with dry eye disease.
This is a video synopsis/summary of a Stakeholder Summit involving:
Ryan Haumschild, PharmD, MS, MBA; Jai G. Parekh, MD, MBA; and Alexander Kabiri, OD.
Haumschild asks about payer criteria for formulary additions. Kabiri states efficacy and costs are key. A costly product lacking incremental efficacy gains little traction. However, a well-tolerated treatment working quickly in a large patient subset despite somewhat higher costs can merit adoption. Haumschild notes such agents balance clinical and economic factors.
Parekh discusses a study showing that the annual per-patient societal costs of dry eye disease are around $11,000, far above the payer cost of $800. He states the payer cost reflects their limited scope. Societal costs encompass patient work and activity impairment. As an example, he notes airline staff temporarily unable to work due to dry eye symptoms. Broader economic impacts are not captured in isolated payer cost analyses.
Haumschild subsequently asks about mitigating the systemic burden of dry eye disease. Kabiri reiterates education around the heterogeneous nature of dry eye subtypes. Evaporative dry eye represents a distinct condition warranting dedicated management rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Aligning patient expectations and payer policies to this reality can promote better adherence, outcomes, and costs.
Video synopsis is AI-generated and reviewed by AJMCÒ editorial staff.
Abortion in 2025: Access, Fertility, and Infant Mortality Updates
February 20th 2025While Republican state-led efforts aim to increase restrictions to abortion care and access to mifepristone and misoprostol in 2025, JAMA authors join the conversation with their published research and commentary.
Read More
Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Linked to Preoperative Immunonutritional Status
February 18th 2025In patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, a high prognostic nutritional index improved survival, while a high systemic immune-inflammation index worsened it. In advanced stages, both affected overall survival but not progression-free survival.
Read More