The shorter timeline to risk and the reduction of shared savings rates are among the 2 greatest challenges accountable care organizations (ACOs) will face as part of the proposed changes to the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), said Allison Brennan, MPP, senior vice president of government affairs for the National Association of ACOs.
The shorter timeline to risk and the reduction of shared savings rates are among the 2 greatest challenges accountable care organizations (ACOs) will face as part of the proposed changes to the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), said Allison Brennan, MPP, senior vice president of government affairs for the National Association of ACOs.
Transcript
What is the greatest challenge you see as part of the proposed MSSP changes?
I think the greatest challenges that we see are, number 1, the shortening of time that new ACOs have before they have to take on risk. Currently, in the program, new ACOs have 6 years before they’re required to take on risk. Even at the end of 6 years at lot of ACOs find that challenging. This proposal would shorten that time frame down to 2 years, and when we say 2 years it’s also important to note that that really only means that ACOs have only 1 year of performance results. So, essentially, it’s like they’re flying blind to make this big leap. They only have a little bit of data and performance to go on before they move into a risk-based model.
Another really significant challenge that we see in the regulation is the proposal to cut in half the shared savings rates for ACOs. Right now, if ACOs meet the requirements in and they’re eligible to share in savings for the government, they get to keep 50% of that savings. Under the proposal they would only get to keep 25% of the savings. When we’re looking at the investments ACOs are making, upfront, which are not counted in the calculations of risk from CMS, they’re looking at a return on investment that’s now being cut in half. And that’s really just a nonstarter for a lot of ACOs. They just don’t think that’s a viable business model with shared savings rates that low.
A couple other challenges that we see in the regulation, there’s a proposal to introduce the distinction among ACOs kind of along hospital versus physician-led lines and we have some concerns about that proposal and would like to see ACOs being treated, kind of, fairly across the board.
Finally, I would say there is a proposal that would terminate ACOs from their program if their spending is a little than projected, and this is under the guise of program integrity, but we really don’t think this is a program integrity proposal. It’s really just looking at spending being slightly different than the benchmark. So, that’s something we’re very concerned about and will be opposing.
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More
New Research Challenges Assumptions About Hospital-Physician Integration, Medicare Patient Mix
April 22nd 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Brady Post, PhD, lead author of a study published in the April 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care®, challenges the claim that hospital-employed physicians serve a more complex patient mix.
Listen
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen