There are some proposed changes to the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) that may be favorably or not depending on the accountable care organization (ACO) and its situation, said Allison Brennan, MPP, senior vice president of government affairs for the National Association of ACOs.
There are some proposed changes to the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) that may be favorably or not depending on the accountable care organization (ACO) and its situation, said Allison Brennan, MPP, senior vice president of government affairs for the National Association of ACOs.
Transcript
What are some proposed changes to the MSSP that some ACOs might see as an opportunity, but others might view as a challenge?
There’s a lot of complexity in this program, and as we look at the impact of certain proposals on various ACOs it can affect ACOs differently. So, a good example of this is benchmarking, where we see a proposal that would change how CMS incorporates a component of regional expenditure data into the benchmark. And the goal of that policy is to avoid comparing ACOs only to their historical performance as times moves on.
And this is something that we’re very supportive of—moving away from just looking at those historical expenditures. If we remain just looking at historical expenditures, eventually they’ll get so low that people can’t achieve savings and always beat their past performance. So, a way to fix that problem is to increasingly compare ACOs to other providers in their region. Some of the proposals in the benchmark change how CMS would incorporate that regional comparison into the benchmark. So, certain ACOs may view that favorably and other ACOs may not view it favorably, depending on how they compare to their regional costs.
Another example is risk adjustment. We are definitely pleased to see some of the proposals CMS put forward with risk adjustment. But some of the other elements of the proposal will be harmful to certain ACOs, so, we’re making some recommendations for CMS to finalize some of elements of the risk adjustment proposals and then modify other elements.
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More
New Research Challenges Assumptions About Hospital-Physician Integration, Medicare Patient Mix
April 22nd 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Brady Post, PhD, lead author of a study published in the April 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care®, challenges the claim that hospital-employed physicians serve a more complex patient mix.
Listen
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen