Sucharu "Chris" Prakash, MD

Gone are the days when oncologists reacted to a cancer diagnosis by using the few drugs we had and hoping for the best. We have evolved from being reactive to proactive, primarily due to advances in precision medicine. From the discovery of circulating DNA to next-generation sequencing (NGS), whereby we can find even minute amounts of tumor-specific alterations, we have come a long way.
Precision medicine in oncology has matured into a sweeping continuum that spans early detection, individualized therapy selection, and dynamic disease monitoring. What was once an aspirational concept is now the foundation of modern cancer care—driven by advances in genomic science, liquid biopsy technologies, and artificial intelligence.
The continuum begins with multicancer early detection (MCED), which seeks to identify malignancies well before symptoms arise. If fully realized, this concept could fundamentally shift oncology from reaction to prevention. By analyzing tumor-derived signals in circulating cell-free DNA, MCED assays hold the potential to detect dozens of cancers with a simple blood draw. Many laboratories have ongoing clinical trials to validate this concept. Early results are promising but may need further validation and health-economic data before broad adoption.
Moving along the continuum, once cancer is identified, NGS plays a pivotal role in shaping personalized therapy. Comprehensive genomic profiling enables oncologists to detect actionable mutations, which guide decisions on targeted therapies and immunotherapy. Despite proven benefits, fewer than half of patients with advanced cancer in the US receive NGS, due to systemic barriers and challenges. As the director of quality services at Texas Oncology, I took on this challenge by implementing a systemwide biomarker testing initiative to systematize and democratize access to precision medicine. Through standardized pathways, streamlined ordering, and clinician education, Texas Oncology now conducts biomarker testing for nearly 100% of eligible patients with advanced solid tumors. This level of adoption ensures that genomic information reliably informs treatment decisions—not by chance or provider variation, but by design.
Beyond tissue-based profiling, liquid biopsies have transformed how we monitor evolving tumor biology. By capturing circulating tumor DNA shed into the bloodstream, this minimally invasive method can detect emerging resistance mutations and guide therapeutic adjustments sooner than traditional imaging. This modality can be particularly beneficial when there is a paucity of tissue, allowing clinicians to adapt care with unprecedented speed and precision.
Pushing even further into the predictive domain, minimal residual disease (MRD) assays are redefining posttreatment surveillance, revealing microscopic disease months before clinical recurrence. As ongoing trials evaluate MRD-guided therapy escalation and de-escalation strategies, MRD is poised to reshape standards of care—helping clinicians intervene earlier, avoid overtreatment, and better stratify recurrence risk.
Layered across this continuum is the accelerating influence of artificial intelligence (AI). AI models trained on vast genomic, clinical, and imaging data sets can identify novel biomarker signatures, predict treatment response, and automate patient identification for testing and clinical trial enrollment.
As precision medicine evolves, its future depends on integrating science, technology, and systems-level execution. The goal is not only to treat cancer precisely, but to detect it earlier, monitor it more intelligently, and deliver equitable access to every patient. This can only happen if we fundamentally change our clinical mindset and health care systems to align with this rapidly evolving field.

Physician-Pharmacy Integration in Cancer Care: Pillars of Medically Integrated Pharmacy
December 16th 2025The foundation of medically integrated pharmacy includes 7 critical pillars. This commentary focuses on the benefits of 3 of those pillars: abandonment, adherence, and access/affordability.
Read More
From MSSP ACOs to Employer Value: Translating Value-Based Principles to Self-Insured Plans
December 12th 2025Value-based care adoption in employer insurance requires replacing fragmented point solutions with unified, at-risk performance contracts that align vendors, providers, and members around total cost and quality goals.
Read More
Legal Issues in Value-Based Care Contracts for Self-Insured Employers
December 12th 2025Self-insured employers face regulatory challenges when adopting value-based contracts, requiring careful data governance, standardized metrics, and legal frameworks to align with federal value-based care models.
Read More
From Complexity to Clarity: A Path to Value in Employer Health Plans
December 12th 2025Employers struggle to define value from health care spending amid complexity and misaligned incentives. Achieving measurable outcomes requires transparency, incentive realignment, and gradual, employee-centered change.
Read More