Not only do pharmacy benefit managers profit thousands of percent using spread pricing, but the spreads are growing; support for Medicare for all is growing among Democrats in Congress, but it's still unclear how such a drastic chage would impact the complex American healthcare system; while precision medicine has great potential, it still has far more failures than successes, but that isn't usually discussed.
Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) make part of their profit on spread pricing, in which companies mark up the difference between the amount they reimburse for a drug and what they charge clients. A new investigation from Bloomberg showed that not only do PBMs profit thousands of percent using this tactic, but the spreads are growing. Spread pricing is most common with generic drugs that cost pennies compared with brand-name drugs. While use of generic drugs has been promoted to control rising drug costs, spread pricing may be undercutting those expected savings, according to critics of the tactic.
Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, does not stand alone—more Democrats are embracing his idea of Medicare for all. While the idea is gaining momentum among Democrats in Congress, as well as the general public, it’s unclear how such a drastic change would impact the complex American healthcare system. Politico pulled together a guide to Medicare for all that answered questions as simple as “what does it actually mean?” as well as more complex ones, such as “what happens to doctors?”
The future of healthcare is a system in which doctors can match patients with the best drug for them and their disease by targeting genetic mutations. While future potential is far from the reality of today, that isn’t always explained. An opinion piece in The New York Times explained that the number of people who can currently be helped with precision medicine is still very small, and successes remain rare. One study found that precision medicine failed to help 93% of 1000 patients treated, while 2 others reported failure to shrink tumors 92% and 95% of the time. Unfortunately, the failures are not always discussed or covered, which can paint a misleading picture of precision medicine.
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More
New Research Challenges Assumptions About Hospital-Physician Integration, Medicare Patient Mix
April 22nd 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Brady Post, PhD, lead author of a study published in the April 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care®, challenges the claim that hospital-employed physicians serve a more complex patient mix.
Listen
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen
Comparing Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Between Fee-for-Service and Medicare Advantage
April 4th 2025This study examined postdiagnosis breast cancer treatment outcomes for Medicare Advantage vs fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare in Ohio and found no significant differences overall but disparities for Black patients with FFS Medicare.
Read More