A new government analysis revealed that despite a previous warning, CMS failed to take steps to ensure that Medicare Part D does not also pay for drugs that should be covered under the Part A hospice benefit; with studies of antidepressants’ safety and efficacy only following patients for a few years and with more people taking antidepressants for longer periods of time, health professionals are concerned that some people taking the drugs for extended periods shouldn’t be and are thus subjecting themselves to side effects and potential health risks; Medicaid advocates in Nebraska have filed a lawsuit to try and force the state to implement Medicaid expansion no later than November 17, 2019.
A new government analysis revealed that despite a previous warning, CMS failed to take steps to ensure that Medicare Part D does not also pay for drugs that should be covered under the Part A hospice benefit. This resulted in $161 million in duplicate payments in 2016. According to STAT News, duplicate payments were pointed out in 2009 by a 2012 report issued by HHS’ Office of the Inspector General (OIG). In the new analysis, the OIG found that Part D paid $422.7 million for 6.7 million prescriptions for beneficiaries who received hospice care. Hospice organizations should have paid for the drugs and hospices or beneficiaries should have paid for the remaining $262 million in Part D total cost.
With studies of antidepressants’ safety and efficacy only following patients for a few years and with more people taking antidepressants for longer periods of time, health professionals are concerned that some people taking the drugs for extended periods shouldn’t be and are thus subjecting themselves to side effects and potential health risks. According to The Wall Street Journal, some studies have suggested some serious potential risks, including one meta-analysis that found people who used antidepressants had a 14% higher risk of heart attacks and strokes and a 33% increased risk of death.
Medicaid advocates in Nebraska have filed a lawsuit to try and force the state to implement Medicaid expansion no later than November 17, 2019, reported The Hill. According to the lawsuit, the state will miss out on approximately $149 million in federal funding by delaying implementation until October 1, 2020. The suit also says that beginning expansion in November this year will allow federal funds to pay for 93% of the cost of expansion. Voters in the state approved a ballot measure last November that would expand coverage to approximately 94,000 residents in the state. State officials have said they need time to implement expansion methodically and that 2020 implementation would allow them to do so.
Despite Record ACA Enrollment, Report Reveals Underinsured Americans Are in Crisis
November 21st 2024Despite significant progress in expanding health insurance coverage since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was enacted, millions of Americans still face critical gaps in access to and affordability of health care.
Read More
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Health Equity & Access Weekly Roundup: November 2, 2024
November 2nd 2024This week’s Center on Health Equity & Access highlights emphasize the role of social determinants of health in policy-making and underscore the importance of addressing rising costs and challenges employers face.
Read More