There may be a small, but not overwhelming, benefit for certain individuals aged 40 to 59 years who have a slightly elevated risk of future cardiovascular disease (CVD) to start taking aspirin, according to an update released by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).
Following a comprehensive review of evidence on the use of aspirin to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has issued an update to its 2016 recommendation, changing its age- and grade-related recommendations for aspirin-related risk reduction in CVD events, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality absent CVD history.
Results were published today in JAMA, and they principally focus on adults 40 years and older with no history of CVD or signs of it (nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke) and low bleeding risk (no history of gastrointestinal ulcers, recent bleeding, other medical conditions, or use of medications that increase bleeding risk).
Those individuals in that category, up to age 59, who have a higher risk of future CVD, may consider a daily aspirin after consulting with their health care provider, the task force said.
Additional areas of focus include how aspirin may affect “CRC incidence and mortality in primary CVD prevention populations, as well as the harms (particularly bleeding) associated with aspirin use,” the USPSTF wrote.
The updated statement follows a draft recommendation released in October by the USPSTF. USPSTF grades range from A to I, with A being the strongest and I the weakest. Certainty levels range from “High” to “Low,” or from strong to insufficient evidence.
USPSTF recommendations are made by volunteer experts; their recommendations are not mandatory but grades of A and B are typically followed by payers and CMS.
In the report released Tuesday, age-related recommendations are broken down to adults aged 40 to 59 years who have at least a 10% 10-year CVD risk and adults 60 years and older.
In the 2016 recommendation, the age ranges covered were younger than 50 years, 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and 70 years or older.
For adults younger than 50 years and 70 years or older, the 2016 statement did not recommend initiating aspirin use, citing “insufficient evidence” on the balance between CVD and CRC primary prevention harms and benefits for both age groups; the recommendation was grade I.
Aspirin was, however, was recommended for those aged 50 to 59 with a 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk (grade B), while it was cited as being an individual choice for adults aged 60 to 69 years with the same risk (grade C).
The 2022 update addresses both of these, with the recommendations again differing between the younger vs older groups.
Now, the individual choice of initiating aspirin use has shifted to younger adults, those aged 40 to 59 years, with the USPSTF noting the benefit of the prevention method is small within this age group. The grade C recommendation also notes a greater potential benefit of preventive low-dose aspirin use among individuals with a low bleeding risk.
In contrast, for adults 60 years and older, the updated recommendation (grade D) is to not initiate low-dose aspirin as a primary preventive measure against CVD.
A low dose of aspirin is considered to be 100 mg/d or less, with most experts prescribing a daily dose of 81 mg. In fact, evidence presented in 2021 at the 70th American College of Cardiology Scientific Session supports initiating aspirin treatment at the 81-mg dose, with better adherence cited, as well as equivalent risks of CV or major bleeding events vs a 325-mg dose.
“The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD events in adults aged 40 to 59 years who have a 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk has a small net benefit,” the organization concluded. “The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that initiating aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD events in adults 60 years or older has no net benefit.”
The organization first recommends, prior to implementing this guidance, that patients and their health care providers hold discussions on implementing preventive aspirin therapy, noting that CVD risk estimation can be “imprecise and imperfect.”
Age should be considered, a CVD risk estimator should be used for patients aged 40 to 59 years, and shared decision-making should be utilized among those with a 10% or greater estimated CVD risk.
In addition, because this newest guidance focuses solely on persons with no history of CVD, signs or symptoms of CVD, or conditions that may necessitate aspirin use, in contrast to those already on aspirin therapy as primary prevention, according to an accompanying editorial, patients in the latter group should discuss any questions they have with their clinicians. This is especially important when questions focus on treatment continuation or discontinuation, the USPSTF emphasized.
Reference
US Preventive Services Task Force. Aspirin use to prevent cardiovascular disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2022;327(16):1577-1584. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.4983
Health Equity & Access Weekly Roundup: November 2, 2024
November 2nd 2024This week’s Center on Health Equity & Access highlights emphasize the role of social determinants of health in policy-making and underscore the importance of addressing rising costs and challenges employers face.
Read More
PAH Treatment Outcomes Similar Regardless of Diagnosis Time
November 1st 2024The study findings underscore the importance of early initiation of macitentan and tadalafil among patients who have pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and represent a shift in understanding of prognosis based on diagnosis timing.
Read More
Sustaining Compassionate Trauma Care Across Communities
September 30th 2024September is National Recovery Month, and we are bringing you another limited-edition month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. In our final episode, we speak with Lyndra Bills, MD, and Shari Hutchison, MS.
Listen
Low Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Palliative Care Referrals for Patients With IPF Persist
October 30th 2024Despite proven benefits, referrals to pulmonary rehabilitation and palliative care for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in England remain significantly lower than for other respiratory conditions.
Read More