Preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplant is a key aspect of patient management, but current cyclosporine concentration guidelines may not be sufficient, according to a recent study.
Cyclosporine (CsA) is a common option for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic stem cell transplant, but the optimal CsA trough target to prevent aGVHD is controversial due to a lack of high-quality evidence. A study published in Clinical Transplantation aimed to identify an optimal CsA trough target and provide clarity on critical post-transplant time points for prophylaxis to prevent aGVHD.
Appropriate immunosuppression to prevent aGVHD, particularly following allogeneic stem cell transplant, is key in minimizing post-transplant toxicity. While aGVHD is rare, moderate to severe aGVHD is associated with lower overall survival (OS) post-transplant. Current CsA trough concentration recommendations vary between 200-400 mcg/L and narrower windows, with a typical minimum trough concentration of 200 mcg/L. But authors of the current study note that some past research suggests 200 mcg/L might be too low and could potentially lead to suboptimal outcomes.
The current study reviewed 565 consecutive adult patients undergoing their first peripheral blood allogeneic stem cell transplant after myeloablative conditioning in the Alberta Bone Marrow Transplant Program between January 2009 and December 2018. After 166 patients were excluded due to either death before engraftment or deviation from the standard conditioning or prophylaxis regimens, the final analysis included 399 patients, and the median follow-up was 1209 days.
All patients had hematological malignancies and received anti-thymocyte globulin, methotrexate, and CsA for aGVHD prophylaxis. On average, the CsA trough concentrations were 273 mcg/L on days 0-14 after transplant, 315 mcg/L on days 15-28, and 241 mcg/L on days 29-56.
Overall, 250 mcg/L was the CsA cut-off value with the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting grade 2-4 aGVHD in this cohort. Those with an average CsA trough concentration lower than 250 mcg/L during days 15-28 post-transplant had a 31.5% rate of grade 2-4 aGVHD, versus 18.8% of patients with an average CsA trough concentration of 250 mcg/L or greater in the same time period (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.04-3.71). During days 0-14 and 29-56, there were no significant associations with aGVHD.
There were no significant associations between average CsA trough levels in days 15-28 and relapse, nor were there associations between CsA trough levels and OS, relapse-related mortality, or non-relapse mortality. Regarding safety, 71.4% of patients developed grade 2 creatinine increases, and 5.5% experienced grade 3 creatinine increases. These changes were not significantly associated with CsA trough levels in days 0-28 after transplant.
Overall, the study suggests that average CsA trough levels below 250 mcg/L may produce higher rates of aGVHD compared with levels of 250 mcg/L or greater. The findings also suggest that immunosuppression prophylaxis should be well within the suggested therapeutic range in the short-term after transplant, not at the lower end of the spectrum. The current range of CsA trough levels may also be too wide, potentially leading to suboptimal outcomes. More studies are warranted to refine the appropriate range of prophylactic CsA trough levels.
The study was limited by its retrospective and single-center nature, as well as the exclusion of patients who discontinued CsA before day 56 post-transplantation. Still, it suggests that CsA trough levels below 250 mcg/L are associated with higher aGVHD rates. Therefore, the authors conclude that maintaining CsA trough concentrations of at least 250 mcg/L in the early days after transplant may help mitigate the risk of aGVHD.
Reference
Kwan ACF, Blosser N, Ghosh S, et al. Toward optimization of cyclosporine concentration target to prevent acute graft-versus-host disease following myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant. Clin Transplant. Published online May 23, 2022. doi:10.1111/ctr.14732
Could On-Body Delivery of Isatuximab Bring More Competition to Anti-CD38 Myeloma Treatment?
June 6th 2025Results for IRAKLIA show noninferiority for Sanofi's on-body delivery system for isatuximab, compared with IV administration. Patients overwhelmingly preferred the hands-free delivery option.
Read More
ICS Use Tied to Fewer Exacerbations in Patients With Bronchiectasis and Elevated Blood Eosinophils
June 6th 2025Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use was common among patients with bronchiectasis and was associated with reduced exacerbations and hospitalizations in those with elevated blood eosinophil counts.
Read More
Real-World Data Support Luspatercept vs ESAs for Anemia in Lower-Risk MDS
June 5th 2025Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received luspatercept showed greater hemoglobin gains and transfusion independence compared with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in a real-world analysis.
Read More
At EHA 2025, Hematology Discussions Will Stretch Across Lifespans and Locations
June 5th 2025The 2025 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress, convening virtually and in Milan, Italy, from June 12 to June 15, 2025, will feature a revamped program structure for the meeting’s 30th anniversary while maintaining ample opportunities to network, debate, and absorb practice-changing findings in hematology and oncology.
Read More