New research highlights racial disparities in hemophilia care, revealing that Black and Hispanic patients are significantly less likely to receive immune tolerance induction treatment compared with White patients, even after considering clinical factors.
The results of a new study revealed disparities in hemophilia treatment, specifically immune tolerance induction (ITI) for patients with inhibitors. When accounting for racial and ethnic factors, the researchers observed Black and Hispanic patients received ITI less often than White patients.
Professional Nurse Preparing Treatment
Image Credit: Viacheslav Yakobchuk - stock.adobe.com
According to the study published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, in racially diverse communities treatment varies throughout racial and ethnic groups, especially with chronic diseases. This cross-sectional investigation aimed to evaluate health care disparities in hemophilia care based on receipt of ITI among patients with hemophilia and an inhibitor in the United States.
The study, conducted between 2013 and 2017, included 614 participants with severe hemophilia A and an inhibitor who entered the CDC Community Counts registry. The participants were aged 5 years or older at the study entry, and all had a history of an inhibitor.
The analysis assessed the proportion of participants receiving ITI, considering race and ethnicity in both bivariable and multivariable analyses. The latter adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates, with unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and corresponding 95% CIs calculated.
Among the 614 participants, 56.4% were non-Hispanic (NH) White, 19.7% were NH Black, 18.4% were Hispanic, and 4.9% were Asian. Overall, 85.2% of participants received ITI. In the bivariable analysis, ITI treatment did not exhibit significant variations across different racial and ethnic groups.
However, the multivariable analysis revealed notable disparities. Upon further investigation, the study accounted for various clinical factors, including driving distance, hemophilia treatment center (HTC) size, and other relevant variables.
In this adjusted analysis, NH Black and Hispanic participants were found to be statistically significantly less likely to have received ITI (aPR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99) relative to NH White participants (aPR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.93), with a 9% and 12% difference, respectively. Asian participants, while showing a nonsignificant trend, were also less likely to receive ITI in adjusted analyses.
The study also explored the aggregated data of NH and non-White participants. When grouped together, this demographic category showed a 12% lower likelihood of receiving ITI compared with NH White participants. This finding indicates that racial and ethnic disparities in ITI treatment exist, even after accounting for various clinical factors.
In analyses specifically focused on participants whose inhibitor was detected when they were 5 years or younger, the proportion receiving ITI treatment was higher at 92.9%. However, even in this subgroup, racial and ethnic differences in ITI treatment persisted, indicating that disparities in treatment patterns extend to early detection scenarios.
As the field of hemophilia care continues to advance, future research should delve deeper into the specific factors contributing to racial disparities in ITI treatment, the researchers noted. Specifically, efforts to address these disparities must extend beyond clinical considerations to encompass the social determinants of health, including systemic biases and cultural competence.
“Although the role of ITI may evolve with growing use of emicizumab and the introduction of new hemophilia treatment products, understanding characteristics that influence care, particularly race and ethnicity where physician bias and patient mistrust can occur, will remain relevant and applicable to other complex therapies, including gene therapy,” they wrote.
Reference
Kempton CL, Payne AB, Fedewa SA. Race, ethnicity, and immune tolerance induction in hemophilia A in the United States. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. Published online November 4, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102251
Symptom Documentation Differences in Acute Cancer Care Suggest Sociodemographic Disparities
April 22nd 2025Researchers are calling for more targeted efforts to improve health equity after a new analysis revealed that cancer symptom documentation and burden vary across certain demographics.
Read More
New Research Challenges Assumptions About Hospital-Physician Integration, Medicare Patient Mix
April 22nd 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Brady Post, PhD, lead author of a study published in the April 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care®, challenges the claim that hospital-employed physicians serve a more complex patient mix.
Listen
Personalized Care Key as Tirzepatide Use Expands Rapidly
April 15th 2025Using commercial insurance claims data and the US launch of tirzepatide as their dividing point, John Ostrominski, MD, Harvard Medical School, and his team studied trends in the use of both glucose-lowering and weight-lowering medications, comparing outcomes between adults with and without type 2 diabetes.
Listen
Integrated CKD Care Model Cuts ED Visits by 30%, Boosts Specialized Treatment
April 21st 2025An analysis of an interdisciplinary care model for managing chronic kidney disease (CKD) shows hospital admissions dropped by 26% and emergency department (ED) visits decreased by 30% after clinic initiation.
Read More