The researchers created a model that simulated what would happen when health systems and providers began working together in Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs) in arrangements that did not extend to outright mergers or acquisitions.
A softer form of health care consolidation, where independent primary care practices align in certain Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs) to negotiate with payers, may lead to higher prices, but not to an overwhelming extent, according to a new study published Monday in Health Affairs.
Researchers focused their work on independent practices joining ACOs led by health systems as allowed under the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP). With these arrangements, there are no outright mergers or acquisitions, but the authors said not much is known about the extent to which arrangements lead to price increases.
To that end, the researchers used claims and enrollment data from a large national commercial insurer that included negotiated payment rates with independent practices from 2010 to 2016, and created a model that simulated what would happen when health systems and providers began working together, hypothesizing “that joint negotiation with health systems would raise nonsystem practices’ prices substantially and abruptly.”
They created an annual price jump indicator for when office visit prices rose by more than 20% over the previous year; they chose 20% because that is the higher baseline price in ACO vs non-ACO practices, they said.
Besides examining the effect of MSSP participation on commercial fee-for-service office visit prices for physician practices that remained independent after joining an ACO, the study also examined the extent to which the health systems’ bargaining position might be strengthened by these arrangements. Potential gains in systems’ primary care market share were also examined.
While there were some larger price jumps, on average, practices joining system-led ACOs saw 4% higher prices, spurred by 7.4% of practices in the model receiving a 49.3% average price increase.
Rather than a major shift of market power, the results may have come from an extension of pricing power from health systems to the independent practices, implying that participation in health system–led MSSP ACOs helped to create higher prices even without outright mergers or acquisitions.
The results are “cautionary evidence” that such arrangements may need closer monitoring, the authors said.
Reference
Lyu PF, Chernew ME, McWilliams JM. Soft consolidation in Medicare ACOs: potential for higher prices without mergers or acquisitions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021;40(6):979-988. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02449
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cost-Related Barriers to Care Among Near-Poor Beneficiaries
October 23rd 2024Among near-poor Black and Hispanic individuals, Medicare Advantage was associated with increased vision care and some, although not uniform, reductions in access disparities vs traditional Medicare.
Read More
Sustaining Compassionate Trauma Care Across Communities
September 30th 2024September is National Recovery Month, and we are bringing you another limited-edition month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. In our final episode, we speak with Lyndra Bills, MD, and Shari Hutchison, MS.
Listen
Hospital Stays and Probable Dementia as Predictors of Relocation to Long-Term Care Facilities
October 22nd 2024This article explores late-life relocations in patients with dementia, hospital stays, and their implications for health care policy, geriatric care, and future research priorities.
Read More
Frameworks for Advancing Health Equity: Community Wellness Centers
September 27th 2024Delia Orosco, MS, director of Community Wellness Centers at Inland Empire Health Plan, shares insight into innovative initiatives provided by the wellness centers and their new mobile mammogram clinics.
Listen
Lower Diagnostic Error Rates Found Among Hospitalized Patients During Care Transitions
October 21st 2024Examining care transitions in hospitalized patients revealed lower diagnostic error rates compared with traditional methods, highlighting the effectiveness of this approach in identifying diagnostic challenges.
Read More