A small pilot study from the Hollings Cancer Center at the Medical University of South Carolina found that smokers who are willing to use e-cigarettes tend to smoke less and have increased quit attempts.
A small pilot study from the Hollings Cancer Center at the Medical University of South Carolina found that smokers who are willing to use e-cigarettes tend to smoke less and have increased quit attempts.
A total of 68 smokers were evaluated with 46 randomized to use e-cigarettes and 22 randomized to a control group. Those in the e-cigarette group were given a device for 3 weeks with either high (24 mg) or low (16 mg) doses of nicotine. Everyone was followed up over a period of 4 months.
Results showed that when smokers were given e-cigarettes without any accompanying instructions or requirements for use, uptake was strong. Many participants went on to buy their own e-cigarettes. This suggests that e-cigarettes might give smokers an alternative to combustible cigarettes, researchers wrote.
“The results are consistent with trials done outside the US,” Matthew Carpenter, PhD, lead author and a tobacco control and addiction expert at the cancer center at the Medical University of South Carolina, said in a statement. “Many people rated the e-cigarettes similar to their usual product, which further suggests that these products might promote switching. Anything that gets smokers off combustible cigarettes is a good thing.”
All e-cigarette users tried the product at least once, with 48% of 24 mg and 30% of 16 mg using their assigned product for the entire 3 weeks. Within the 24 mg group, 57% made an independent purchase, versus 28% of 16 mg, and 14% of control participants (P = 0.01).
Those who used e-cigarettes smoked less and were more likely to quit smoking, as compared to those in the control group. Smokers in both e-cigarette groups significantly reduced their smoking, whereas control participants did not (P = 0.03).
This study was different from other studies looking at e-cigarettes in that it showed how smokers would behave naturally with the product without additional guidance, and it was randomized. Most other studies compare self-selected users versus nonusers and include instruction on how to use the product.
The study, funded by the NIH, was published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention in November.
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Uniting to Support Patients With Cancer Beyond Treatment
November 17th 2024Kasey Bond, MPH, of Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, speaks to why it’s vital to keep patients at the center of all strategic partnerships between academic institutions and community-based oncology practices.
Read More
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Bridging Cancer Care Gaps and Overcoming Medical Mistrust
November 13th 2024In this clip from our interview with Oscar B. Lahoud, MD, cochair of our Institute for Value-Based Medicine® evening hosted with NYU Langone Health, he addressed medical mistrust in underrepresented communities.
Read More
How English- and Spanish-Preferring Patients With Cancer Decide on Emergency Care
November 13th 2024Care delivery innovations to help patients with cancer avoid emergency department visits are underused. The authors interviewed English- and Spanish-preferring patients at 2 diverse health systems to understand why.
Read More