A team of 20 scientists in the fields of informatics, statistics, epidemiology, systematic reviews, cancer biology, and nutrition have developed a tool that will assess the links in published human studies between lifestyle factors and cancer.
A team of 20 scientists in the fields of informatics, statistics, epidemiology, systematic reviews, cancer biology, and nutrition have developed a tool that will assess the links in published human studies between lifestyle factors and cancer. This framework was recommended by the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) and the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), and published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention.
“This exciting new methodology has the potential to become the mainstream approach to review mechanistic studies. It also offers a platform to inform the direction of future research in the area of diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer,” Giota Mitrou, PhD, MS, director of Research Funding & Science External Relations at World Cancer Research Fund International, said in a press release.
The method will accelerate the process of understanding the biological details relating to cancer prevention through lifestyle changes.
Sarah Lewis, PhD, BSc, senior lecturer in Genetic Epidemiology at University of Bristol and one of the lead researchers on the new tool, stated, “This is an important step for cancer research. It will enable researchers to realistically assess the science so that we can exploit what we know and focus future studies on addressing progress-limiting gaps.”
Lifestyle factors analyzed in human studies include diet, physical activity, and body weight, as well as how certain cancers are more likely to be affected by these factors. There are thousands of studies that have supporting evidence of a link to cancer; however, there was no systematic process to assess the strength of the studies until the AICR/WCRF framework.
The scientists created a 2-phase strategy, in which phase 1 used an automated online tool called Text Mining for Mechanism Prioritisation, or TeMMPo, to rank all potential mechanisms that link a lifestyle factor to a type of cancer. The program finds search terms that include a list of intermediate phenotypes, such as DNA damage, that link a risk factor to cancer.
The second phase reviews and assesses the strength of the evidence produced by the studies supporting a potential link between dietary or lifestyle choices and cancer. The authors find it necessary to measure the quality of the study as it will increase the strength of the correlation between risk factors and cancer.
“We believe that the methodology we have developed can be applied to the integration of mechanistic studies into systematic reviews of exposures and disease to aid the inference of causality, and in addition may highlight gaps in our knowledge where further studies are needed,” the authors concluded.
References
Lewis SJ, Gardner M, Higgins J, et al. Developing the WCRF International/University of Bristol methodology for identifying and carrying out systematic reviews of mechanisms of exposure-cancer associations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Nov;26(11):1667-1675. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0232.
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
Community Engagement, Culturally Tailored Care as a Gateway to Advancing Health Equity
October 16th 2024Many talks at the Association of Cancer Care Centers (ACCC) 41st National Oncology Conference advocated for the adoption of culturally relevant care, the leveraging of community partnerships, and community engagement to build better trust with patients and improve outcomes.
Read More
Combatting Misconceptions of Clinical Trials to Improve Patient Participation
October 16th 2024There are many misconceptions patients might have about clinical trials that prevent them from participating, and it’s important to understand what they are in order to overcome them, said Terry L. Keys, of University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center.
Read More