Biomarkers are being used in patients with cancer to target treatments that will work best. Interviews with OncLive® highlight how biomarkers are being used in colorectal and bladder cancer.
As cancer therapies become more targeted, biomarkers are an increasingly important tool to help understand a patient’s individual cancer and identify the treatments that will work best.
For instance, in colorectal cancer, approximately 40% of patients have KRAS wild-type disease, and established therapies such as cetuximab and panitumumab are effective, Atrayee Basu-Mallick, MD, a medical oncologist at Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, and clinical assistant professor at the Thomas Jefferson University, recently told OncLive®.
On the other hand, approximately 8% of patients with colorectal cancer have a BRAF mutation, and the median survival for patients with BRAF wild-type disease is only about 13 months. Chemotherapy is not very effective for most of these patients, but they may be able to receive a combination therapy of encorafenib plus cetuximab or encorafenib, cetuximab, and binimetinib.
These combination therapies would not be ideal for patients with HER2-positive disease, though, Basu-Mallick explained. For those patients, trastuzumab plus pertuzumab or trastuzumab plus lapatinib have resulted in more favorable overall response rates.
Watch the interview with Basu-Mallick on OncLive®.
In a separate interview with OncLive®, Michael Devitt, MD, explained how biomarker-guided therapies are being used in patients with bladder cancer. According to Devitt, hematologist and oncologist and assistant professor at the University of Virginia Medical Center, noted that PD-L1 and FGFR are the 2 biomarkers frequently used in bladder cancer.
PD-L1 may identify patients who were ineligible for cisplatin in the frontline setting but may benefit from treatment with carboplatin-based chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Patients with low or no expression of PD-L1 would not benefit from frontline immunotherapy because their response rates to PD-1 inhibitors are low, he explained.
Watch the interview with Devitt.
Lastly, new research has identified patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who are more likely to respond to rucaparib. The phase 2 ARIEL2 trial found that RAD51C and RAD51D mutations and high-level BRCA1 promotor methylation are predictive of response to rucaparib. Meanwhile, among patients who were naïve to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, platinum sensitivity was a strong predictor of response to rucaparib.
In homologous recombination deficiency–associated high-grade ovarian cancer, patients with better outcomes on rucaparib had platinum-sensitive disease and had received fewer lines of prior platinum treatments (1 or 2 prior therapies vs 3 or 4 prior therapies).
Read more about the study on OncLive®.
Global Trends in Ovarian Cancer Incidence Highlight Regional, Histological Variations
January 7th 2025Between 1988 and 2017, there were significant global variations and trends in ovarian cancer incidence and its subtypes, influenced by genetic, reproductive, and socioeconomic factors.
Read More
MRD Status Prior to Allo-HSCT Shows Strong Prognostic Value in AML, MDS
January 6th 2025A study demonstrated that pre-transplant measurable residual disease (MRD) status is a strong prognostic factor for overall survival, disease-free survival, and relapse risk in patients with AML and MDS undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Read More
Male Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Face Higher Complication Rates
January 6th 2025Compared with female patients, male patients with eosinophilic esophagitis have higher rates of complications, including esophageal obstruction, food impaction, and rupture, highlighting potential gender differences in disease severity.
Read More