Edgardo S. Santos, MD, FACP, FASCO, highlighted how liquid biopsies are transforming lung cancer care by enabling faster, less invasive diagnostics, with key applications in early detection, predictive biomarker identification, treatment response monitoring, resistance mechanism assessment, and minimal residual disease detection.
In an interview, Edgardo S. Santos, MD, FACP, FASCO, a hematologist and medical oncologist at the Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, highlighted how liquid biopsies are revolutionizing the early detection and management of lung cancer. He explained that liquid biopsies minimize the need for invasive procedures like surgical biopsies, which can lead to complications such as lung collapse. Additionally, the turnaround time for results has significantly improved, now taking just 3 to 5 days compared with 10 days a decade ago, enabling faster diagnosis and treatment initiation.
Santos outlined 5 key applications of liquid biopsies. While some advancements, like early detection and minimal residual disease assessment, are still emerging, Santos expressed optimism about their potential to further transform oncology care in the near future.
This transcript has been lightly edited for clarity.
Transcript
How might liquid biopsies and other non-invasive diagnostic tools impact the early detection and management of lung cancer?
Yeah. So thank you to [The American Journal of Managed Care®] for having me this afternoon. So basically, liquid biopsy has completely revolutionized how we deal with oncology patients in general. So liquid biopsy has brought to us the possibility, a few years ago, to avoid perhaps invasive procedures like surgical biopsy, especially my field, which is lung cancer, that can cause significant morbidity to the patient, like, for example, to have collapse of the lung that will require hospitalizations to the patient in general. So that is one issue.
The other issue that liquid biopsy has brought concomitantly is the turn around time in which—for example, we started a decade ago to have this technology reporting the results in 10 days and now we can have the results in 3 to 5 days. So it's a significant impact to diagnose a patient with predictive biomarker so quickly, so we can start a patient on the appropriate therapy very fast.
So liquid biopsy can have a lot of utility. One of them, as I mentioned, is to make the diagnosis of a predictive biomarker that will allow us to deliver target therapy. And that goes a with hand in hand with personalized medicine, precision medicine, and individualized medicine because we are able to identify a particular pathway which drives the cancer and we can deliver this personalized medicine.
The other utility is when the patient tumor start to progress, how to diagnose a mechanism of resistance and again, go more individualized, more precise, more personalized medicine in that regard.
Another utility is to assess response. Why? Because the technology in liquid biopsy has advanced so much that now with the inclusion, not only a genomic but also epigenomics, we are able to calculate more precisely the tumor fraction. So we can measure the tumor fraction from the beginning and how the patient's system responds to the therapy, which could be immunotherapy, chemo-immunotherapy, or targeted therapy, we are able to predict basically the tumor fraction changes [so see] whether the patient is responding or not.
And then finally, 2 more utilities for liquid biopsy that are top of mind in oncology is minimal residual disease, which is still very new—we are doing more research to try to measure them precisely—and early detection of cancer, and that is more new. Perhaps some people when they are listening us to giving this kind of lecture sounds like science fiction, but we are looking forward to have these as a reality in the years to come. So those are the 5 [ways] we can use liquid biopsy.
Managed Care Cast Presents: BTK Inhibitors in Treatment-Naive Patients With CLL and MCL
December 26th 2024A trio of experts discuss the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, including cost considerations.
Listen
HS Treatment Goals: Better Quality of Life, Not Just Control
January 3rd 2025For part 3 of our discussion with Chris Sayed, MD, we tackle several important topics in the hidradenitis suppurative (HS) and inflammatory disease space: patient quality of life, medication and treatment goals, and the possibility of a cure.
Read More
Dr Yehuda Handelsman: DCRM Guidelines Are Shaping Integrated, Global CRM Care
January 3rd 2025In part 2 of our interview, Yehuda Handelsman, MD, discusses how cardiorenalmetabolic (CRM) disease management is advancing with the 2022 Diabetes, Cardiorenal, and Metabolic (DCRM) multispecialty practice recommendations and the updated DCRM 2.0 guidelines.
Read More
Stripped of Fucose, Powerful Monoclonal Antibody Shows Promising Results in MDS Dosing Study
January 2nd 2025Nicole Grieselhuber, MD, PhD, of The Ohio State University, discusses results from Part D of a dosing study involving patients with previously untreated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who were treated with a combination of SEA-CD70 and azacitidine.
Read More