• Center on Health Equity & Access
  • Clinical
  • Health Care Cost
  • Health Care Delivery
  • Insurance
  • Policy
  • Technology
  • Value-Based Care

Proton Radiation-Yea or Nay?

Article

Controversy over the value of proton beam radiation continues to harass clinicians as the therapy emerges to be extremely useful in some, but not all, cancers. Additionally, payers sometimes refuse to cover treatment costs due to lack of evidence of efficacy.

Everyone seems to agree that proton beam therapy—a type of radiation that can attack cancerous tumors while generally sparing the surrounding tissue—is an exciting technology with a lot of potential. But some insurers and disease experts say that, until there’s better evidence that proton therapy is more effective at treating various cancers than traditional types of less expensive radiation, coverage shouldn’t be routine.

That approach doesn’t sit well with proponents, some of whom say that insurance coverage is critical for necessary research of the controversial therapy’s uses.

Meanwhile, the number of proton therapy centers—huge structures that can cost more than $200 million—continues to increase. Fourteen are in operation in the United States and a dozen more under development, according to Leonard Arzt, executive director of the National Association for Proton Therapy.

Read the complete report: http://bit.ly/1v5OrpS

Source: Kaiser Health News

Related Videos
Jorge García, PharmD, MS, MBA, MHA, FACHE, FACCC
Screenshot of an interview with Shaun McKenzie, MD
Screenshot of an interview with Shaun McKenzie, MD
Screenshot of an interview with Rohan Garje, MD
Susan Escudier, MD, FACP
Sabarish Ayyappan, MD
Susan Escudier, MD, FACP
Screenshot of an interview with Evangelia Vlachou, MD
Screenshot of an interview with Barry Goy, MD
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences
AJMC®
All rights reserved.