Personalized testing is preferred for patients with NSCLC with mutations, but there are challenges to implementing this testing, said Yang Xia, MD, PhD.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has promise as a therapeutic monitoring tool, but personalization by patient is important, and there remain challenges around turnaround time, cost and reimbursement, and integrating the process into the workflow, said Yang Xia, MD, PhD, of the Department of Respiratory Medicine at the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Xia presented the abstract “Comparative Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring Strategies in Advanced NSCLC With MET Exon 14 Skipping Treated With Ensartinib” at the 2025 World Lung Cancer Conference, held September 6-9, 2025, in Barcelona, Spain.
The abstract reviewed a translational biomarker study based on the main findings of the EMBRACE trial. Xia and his colleagues evaluated ctDNA for monitoring MET exon 14 skipping mutation in non–small cell lung cancer.
The transcript has been edited for clarity; captions are auto-generated.
Transcript
How should a provider, in a real-world clinical setting, decide which ctDNA monitoring strategy to use for a patient? Is it a "one-size-fits-all" approach, or does it need to be personalized?
I think it should be personalized. We recommend starting with specific testing for early response assessments. If resistance is suspected, it’s important [to conduct] canonical or permutation panels to identify the resistant mechanism. Not all patients need broad testing; base [the testing] on clinical context and resource availability.
What are the key logistical challenges of implementing routine serial ctDNA testing in a cancer center or community oncology practice?
I think the key challenges include standardization. Now there is lack of consensus on optimal panel timing and interpretation. The second [challenge] is turnaround time. In China, it usually takes 1 week, but in the United States, it may [take up to] 1 month. The third [challenge] is the cost and the reimbursements. The coverage for serous testing is not universal. The last [challenge] is the integration to the workflow, coordinating blood draw processing and data analysis, something like that.
AI in Health Care: Balancing Governance, Innovation, and Trust
September 2nd 2025In this conversation with Reuben Daniel, associate vice president of artificial intelligence at UPMC Health Plan, we dive into how UPMC Health Plan builds trust with providers and members, discuss challenges of scaling AI effectively, and hear about concrete examples of AI's positive impact.
Listen
Current and Emerging Options for Uncommon EGFR- and Exon 20 Insertion–Mutated NSCLC
September 8th 2025Uncommon EGFR mutations in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain challenging to treat, but new tyrosine kinase inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and a proposed “PACCage insert” framework provide opportunities to advance precision therapy.
Read More
Infertility Coverage Boosts ART Use and Pregnancy Success: Richard A. Brook, MS, MBA
August 26th 2025In this episode, Richard A. Brook, MS, MBA, discusses his study showing that infertility treatment coverage increases assisted reproductive technology (ART) use and improves pregnancy outcomes.
Listen
Clinical Advances in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Insights From MARIPOSA and FLAURA2
September 7th 2025Treatment of EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is shifting toward next-generation sequencing and combination regimens that improve survival but increase toxicity, requiring individualized care.
Read More
Evolving Roles of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Treatment of NSCLC
September 7th 2025Antibody-drug conjugates are rapidly reshaping the treatment landscape of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with advances in design, clinical efficacy, and regulatory approvals tempered by ongoing challenges in toxicity, resistance, and biomarker optimization.
Read More