Therapies for rare diseases, such as gene therapy, pose very unique challenges to value assessments in a variety of different ways, explained Paul Melmeyer, director of Federal Policy, National Organization for Rare Disorders.
Therapies for rare diseases, such as gene therapy, pose very unique challenges to value assessments in a variety of different ways, explained Paul Melmeyer, director of Federal Policy, National Organization for Rare Disorders.
Transcript
How do therapies for rare conditions, such as gene therapy, present unique challenges to value assessment?
Therapies for rare diseases, and especially gene therapies for rare diseases, pose very unique challenges to value assessments in a variety of different ways. For one, the values that therapies for rare diseases, again in particular gene therapies, actually bring to rare disease patients are very unique, and that can be challenging for health technology bodies to actually incorporate these values into their assessments because they can be very unique, they can be very hard to quantify, they can be hard to reach because rare disease patients are scattered, they’re difficult to often times to bring in to a conclusive and a methodologically robust way, in a sense, within a value technology assessment.
So, because of this, it can be very challenging for HTA [health technology assessment] bodies to actually incorporate patient viewpoints within rare disease and gene therapy evaluations, and that’s just on the patient viewpoint side of things. Of course, it can be very challenging on the actual methodological side of things when it comes to rare diseases because of, again, the small patient sizes. So, it’s more difficult to conduct an empirical study, as well as some other methodological challenges that come along with the small sample sizes that rare diseases bring. So, a variety of different challenges in assessing rare disease therapies, specifically gene therapies.
Impact of Amivantamab-Lazertinib on EGFR, MET Resistance Alterations in NSCLC: Danny Nguyen, MD
September 15th 2025The combination of amivantamab and lazertinib in first-line non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) significantly reduces resistance mechanisms with implications for second-line treatment, said Danny Nguyen, MD, of City of Hope.
Read More
Disparities in Biomarker Testing Impact Nonsquamous NSCLC Outcomes: Surbhi Singhal, MD
September 6th 2025Surbhi Singhal, MD, of the University of California Davis, discussed disparities in biomarker testing among patients diagnosed with stage IV nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Read More