Over the course of treatment, patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may acquire new TP53 mutations, making ongoing monitoring for mutations crucial.
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and TP53 mutations often do not respond as well to standard treatments and have worse outcomes. New research has found that new TP53 mutations may occur during therapy, making sequential monitoring for mutations increasingly relevant as more TP53-targeting therapies for AML emerge.
To understand the clinical implications of TP53 mutations in the emerging therapeutic landscape of AML, researchers evaluated the frequency of the mutations emerging over the course of therapy in patients who relapsed or were refractory to initial treatment. The findings were published in American Journal of Hematology.
“New novel therapies currently in clinical trials are poised to become important strategies for TP53-mutated AML,” the authors wrote. “In this context, detection of TP53 mutations is important in order to select alternative strategies.”
They retrospectively reviewed the records of 1293 patients with newly diagnosed TP53 wild type (WT) AML between December 2012 and March 2020. They identified 200 patients who had relapsed or were refractory to frontline therapy. The median age of these patients was 69 years and nearly half (44%) had normal karyotype.
Other baseline characteristics included:
After frontline therapy, 43% were refractory to therapy and 58% relapsed after a median of 6 months.
The researchers found 15% of patients developed a new TP53 mutation during therapy. The majority of those patients (66%) developed the mutation after the first line of therapy, 21% after 2 lines of therapy, and 14% of patients after 3 lines of therapy.
More than half (55%) of patients with new mutations had received frontline intensive chemotherapy. Most patients (83%) had developed 1 TP53 mutation, while 17% acquired 2 mutations. The first detection of TP53 mutation happened a median of 10 months after diagnosis.
Factors associated with an increased likelihood of developing a new TP53 mutation were:
Age or other cytogenetic/molecular features were not associated with the development of new TP53 mutations, neither was complex karyotype vs non–complex karyotype at baseline.
After acquiring a mutation, 79% of patients received low-intensity chemotherapy, 7% high-intensity chemotherapy, and 14% no treatment. Most (68%) patients receiving chemotherapy responded, and 7 of those patients underwent HSCT.
The median overall survival after acquiring TP53 mutation was 4.6 months and the 1-year survival rate was just 19%.
“Overall, our findings suggest that sequential monitoring for new, emergent TP53 mutations over the course of AML therapy might have clinical utility,” the authors concluded. “Such monitoring may be particularly relevant in the era of novels therapies with the potential to target TP53-mutated myeloid malignancies.”
Reference
Alwash Y, Khoury JD, Tashakori M, et al. Development of TP53 mutations over the course of therapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. Published online August 5, 2021. doi:10.1002/ajh.26314
Ovarian Cancer Survival Gaps Persist Across Racial, Ethnic Groups
May 27th 2025Abstracts published ahead of the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting found persistent ovarian cancer survival disparities among racial and ethnic subgroups, particularly within disaggregated Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander populations.
Read More
The Role of Pharmacists Expands Beyond Dispensing for Novel Cancer Therapies: Eileen Peng, PharmD
May 21st 2025The advent of novel cancer care therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies is transforming the role of pharmacists in enhancing patient care.
Read More
The Role of Transplant in the Era of Novel MM Therapies: Harsh Parmar, MD
May 17th 2025Novel therapies for multiple myeloma (MM), including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell and bispecific antibodies, extend lives but raise concerns about treatment costs and adherence, and they haven't replaced stem cell transplantation, Harsh Parmar, MD, of Hackensack University Medical Center, explains.
Read More