Clinicians and nurses who treat patients with hemophilia with a gene therapy identified important factors and considerations needed in a potential shared decision making tool.
The article was originally published on CGTLive®.
A new paper published in Haemophilia has outlined the need for a shared decision making (SMD) tool for clinicians treating patients with gene therapy for hemophilia, and has proposed a tool to be refined and evaluated in clinical practice and real-world experiences.
“A clinician-oriented SDM tool may prepare clinicians to talk about gene therapy with persons with hemophilia and provide a systematic approach to the discussion,” study authors Jacqueline Limjoco, RN, and Courtney D. Thornburg, MD, both from Hemophilia and Thrombosis Treatment Center, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, wrote in the paper. “This study was designed to inform the development of a clinician SDM tool by understanding clinician experience with SDM and key gene therapy attributes to include in the tool.
The paper focused on decision making specifically for patients with hemophilia A being treated with valoctocogene roxaparvovec (val-rox; BioMarin), approved under the name Roctavian. Limjoco and Thornburg surveyed 10 clinicians and 2 nurses from the Hemophilia and Thrombosis Treatment Center that had 1 to 27 years of experience caring for patients with hemophilia.
The participants had no (n = 1), slight (n = 3), moderate (n = 5) and high (n = 1) confidence in having a clinical discussion about gene therapy and all agreed that an SDM tool would be useful for clinical practice. The participants gave feedback on language and presentation, content, and implementation of a potential tool, which should provide unbiased information and have companion tools with patient-centric language.
Regarding language and presentation, participants stressed the importance of specified definitions of terms for different types of bleeds or adverse events, which can be further simplified for patients. In terms of actual content of the tool, the participants identified the need for guidance concerning the process of gene therapy, including post-infusion follow-up, the safety, including need for immune suppression, the efficacy, including durability of response, as well as psychosocial impact, impact on family planning and alcohol consumption, and other factors including insurance coverage and other treatment options.
The participants thought that the tool should be unbiased and able to be updated. Another consideration that remains to be refined is whether the SDM tool should be split into 2 parts between provider and patient or combined into one.
“Data from this study demonstrates the need for provider education to increase confidence in discussing [gene therapy] and answering questions about safety and efficacy. This is like prior findings from provider surveys,” Limjoco and Thornburg wrote. “The tool includes resources for gene therapy education available through the National Hemophilia Foundation, the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, the World Federation of Hemophilia, etc. Participants are familiar with SDM but did not identify any specific tools to guide discussion of gene therapy. With the first approvals of hemophilia gene therapy, these tools are urgently needed.”
Reference
Limjoco J, Thornburg CD. Development of a haemophilia A gene therapy shared decision-making tool for clinicians. Haemophilia. 2023; 00-00. doi:10.1111/hae.14822
New Research Challenges Assumptions About Hospital-Physician Integration, Medicare Patient Mix
April 22nd 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Brady Post, PhD, lead author of a study published in the April 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care®, challenges the claim that hospital-employed physicians serve a more complex patient mix.
Listen
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More
Personalized Care Key as Tirzepatide Use Expands Rapidly
April 15th 2025Using commercial insurance claims data and the US launch of tirzepatide as their dividing point, John Ostrominski, MD, Harvard Medical School, and his team studied trends in the use of both glucose-lowering and weight-lowering medications, comparing outcomes between adults with and without type 2 diabetes.
Listen
"The Barriers Are Real": Antoine Keller, MD, on Geography and Cardiovascular Health
April 18th 2025Health care disparities are often driven by where patients live, explained Antoine Keller, MD, as he discussed the complex, systematic hurdles that influence the health of rural communities.
Read More
New Research Challenges Assumptions About Hospital-Physician Integration, Medicare Patient Mix
April 22nd 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Brady Post, PhD, lead author of a study published in the April 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care®, challenges the claim that hospital-employed physicians serve a more complex patient mix.
Listen
What's at Stake as Oral Arguments Are Presented in the Braidwood Case? Q&A With Richard Hughes IV
April 21st 2025Richard Hughes IV, JD, MPH, spoke about the upcoming oral arguments to be presented to the Supreme Court regarding the Braidwood case, which would determine how preventive services are guaranteed insurance coverage.
Read More
Personalized Care Key as Tirzepatide Use Expands Rapidly
April 15th 2025Using commercial insurance claims data and the US launch of tirzepatide as their dividing point, John Ostrominski, MD, Harvard Medical School, and his team studied trends in the use of both glucose-lowering and weight-lowering medications, comparing outcomes between adults with and without type 2 diabetes.
Listen
"The Barriers Are Real": Antoine Keller, MD, on Geography and Cardiovascular Health
April 18th 2025Health care disparities are often driven by where patients live, explained Antoine Keller, MD, as he discussed the complex, systematic hurdles that influence the health of rural communities.
Read More
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512