End-stage cancer patients who were in general the healthiest and most active displayed worse quality of life signs in their last week of life when they were given palliative chemotherapy and there were no benefits to overall survival.
Many clinical practices and oncologists believe that treating terminally ill cancer patients who may be have 6 months or less of life with chemotherapy may ease symptoms and extend life expectancy. However, researchers with the Weill Cornell Medical College say otherwise.
Researchers found in a recent study that end-stage cancer patients who were in general the healthiest and most active displayed worse quality of life signs in their last week of life when they were given palliative chemotherapy and there were no benefits to overall survival.
"This study demonstrates that palliative chemotherapy does not appear to palliate symptoms even in the most robust patients who can tolerate chemotherapy," Holly G. Prigerson, PhD, co-director of the Center for Research on End-of-Life Care and the Irving Sherwood Wright Professor in Geriatrics at Weill Cornell, said in a statement. "It raises questions about the rationale for such aggressive, burdensome care."
In examining 661 patients with advanced metastatic disease and cancer progression, researchers employed a scale to determine the patients’ health and functioning a few months prior to their passing and then conducted interviews with the patient’s most closely involved caregivers a week after death to understand physiological and physical distress and overall quality of life.
Among their results, the authors found that the quality of life in end-stage patients near death did not improve and in some cases worsened with palliative chemotherapy treatment, even in patients who showed good performance and healthy activity in the beginning of their cancer development.
“ASCO [The American Society for Clinical Oncology] has attempted to respond to the need to limit widespread, wasteful, and unnecessary treatment practices in formulating guidelines to restrict care only to patients with cancer expected to benefit from it,” the authors wrote. "Our results raise questions about the benefits and use of chemotherapy in patients in the end-stage of their illness regardless of their performance status.”
Current and Emerging Options for Uncommon EGFR- and Exon 20 Insertion–Mutated NSCLC
September 8th 2025Uncommon EGFR mutations in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain challenging to treat, but new tyrosine kinase inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and a proposed “PACCage insert” framework provide opportunities to advance precision therapy.
Read More
Exploring Racial, Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Care Prior Authorization Decisions
October 24th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the author of a study published in the October 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® that explored prior authorization decisions in cancer care by race and ethnicity for commercially insured patients.
Listen
Evolving Roles of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in the Treatment of NSCLC
September 7th 2025Antibody-drug conjugates are rapidly reshaping the treatment landscape of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with advances in design, clinical efficacy, and regulatory approvals tempered by ongoing challenges in toxicity, resistance, and biomarker optimization.
Read More
From Amivantamab to Next-Generation Therapies: The Evolving Bispecific Antibody Landscape in NSCLC
September 6th 2025Bispecific antibodies are emerging as a transformative class in advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with agents such as amivantamab and zenocutuzumab already demonstrating clinical benefit and a broad pipeline of investigational therapies showing promise in overcoming resistance.
Read More