The National Quality Forum’s Measure Applications Partnership recently released guidelines on measures for the new Merit-Based Incentive Payment System and on cross-cutting issues for all federal healthcare programs.
The National Quality Forum (NQF)’s Measure Applications Partnership (MAP) recently released guidelines on measures for the new Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and on cross-cutting issues for all federal healthcare programs.
The recommendations, presented by MAP, for measures in these programs, reflect how well the measures address the identified program goals, as well as NQF’s prior work in identifying families of measures. Some of the dominating issues for clinician programs identified included: the new MIPS aligning all clinician measures into a single program; further alignment of clinician measures warranted with alternative payment model and hospital/facility measures; increased public reporting of clinician measures on Physician Compare; and measuring gaps in both MIPS and Medicare Shared Savings Program.
For the purpose of the review, MAP considered 60 performance measures for use in MIPS. MIPS is a program legislated by the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) in CMS. MIPS combines the Physician Quality Reporting System, the Value Modifier, and the Medicare Electronic Health Record incentive program into a single program. This single program is responsible for adjusting eligible providers’ Medicare payments based on performance.
“As the US healthcare system increasingly shifts to a performance-based payment system, MAP’s role as an impartial advisor bringing stakeholders together from across the healthcare spectrum is more important than ever,” said Helen Burstin, NQF’s chief scientific officer. “The recommendations MAP made for MIPS, MSSP, and other federal healthcare programs are advancing measurement to help make better healthcare a reality for all Americans.”
Exploring in detail, the following recommendations were proposed on cross-cutting issues to HHS:
This report highlights major changes in the types of measures submitted for consideration for use and notes that this year, for the first time, more outcome measures were submitted for consideration than process measures.
The Impact of Cost Sharing on High-Value Care
March 14th 2025Michael Chernew, PhD, professor of health care policy and director of the Healthcare Markets and Regulation Lab, Harvard Medical School, shares how cost-sharing policies shape access to critical health care services and influence value-based insurance design.
Read More
Varied Access: The Pharmacogenetic Testing Coverage Divide
February 18th 2025On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we speak with the author of a study published in the February 2025 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® to uncover significant differences in coverage decisions for pharmacogenetic tests across major US health insurers.
Listen
Value-Based Care Is Key to Bringing Cardiology Breakthroughs to Those Who Will Benefit Most
March 13th 2025On December 10, 2024, cardiologists, researchers, and value-based care experts gathered in Dallas, Texas, to discuss best practices for implementing advances in cardiology care with a value-based mindset, spanning the care continuum from prevention to treatment.
Read More
VBID, Heading Into a Third Decade, Looks to Promote Personalization and Access
March 12th 2025Speakers at the 2025 Value-Based Insurance Design summit recapped the accomplishments made over the past 20 years in designing insurance benefits with value in mind and looked ahead to iterations to come.
Read More