A novel costing strategy has been used to determine the cost of care across the entire care process for benign prostate hyperplasia, according to researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles.
A novel costing strategy has been used to determine the cost of care across the entire care process for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), according to researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). The results of their study were published in The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation.
The time-driven, activity-based costing strategy revealed a 400% discrepancy between the most and least expensive treatment options for BPH just within UCLA. According to lead author Alan Kaplan, MD, a resident physician in the UCLA Department of Urology, the findings are particularly important in BPH because there aren’t any proven difference in outcomes between higher and lower cost treatments.
“The rising cost of health care is unsustainable, and a big part of the problem is that health systems, health care providers and policy makers have a poor understanding of how much health care really costs,” Dr Kaplan said in a statement. “Until this is well understood, taxpayers, insurers and patients alike will continue to bear the burden of soaring health care costs.”
The researchers implemented the time-drive, activity-based costing strategy across the entire care pathway for BPH, including primary and specialist care in both inpatient and outpatient settings.
“Cost can be a dirty word in medicine,” Dr Kaplan said. “People want the best healthcare money can buy. A poor understanding of healthcare costs means a lot of waste and unnecessary expenses that are borne mostly by patients.”
They found that invasive diagnostic testing, which is listed as “optional” in practice guidelines, can increase costs by 150% compared with the standalone urology clinic visit.
Invasive procedures, which can range from in-office minimally invasive to outpatient surgery to inpatient open surgery, are often needed for patients when medical therapies are no longer effective.
“As financial risk is shifted toward providers, understanding the cost of care will be vital,” the authors concluded. “Future work is needed to determine outcome discrepancy between the diagnostic and surgical modalities in BPH.”
"The Barriers Are Real": Antoine Keller, MD, on Geography and Cardiovascular Health
April 18th 2025Health care disparities are often driven by where patients live, explained Antoine Keller, MD, as he discussed the complex, systematic hurdles that influence the health of rural communities.
Read More
Personalized Care Key as Tirzepatide Use Expands Rapidly
April 15th 2025Using commercial insurance claims data and the US launch of tirzepatide as their dividing point, John Ostrominski, MD, Harvard Medical School, and his team studied trends in the use of both glucose-lowering and weight-lowering medications, comparing outcomes between adults with and without type 2 diabetes.
Listen
Understanding How Fitness Affects Digestive Diseases
April 18th 2025Exercise is a powerful modulator of gut health in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, as moderate activity can ease gut inflammation, reduce colorectal cancer risk, and relieve constipation, while intense workouts may backfire, causing reflux, GI bleeding, or gut barrier disruption.
Read More
Key Indicators of Myasthenia Gravis Disease Progression Reduced With Efgartigimod
April 18th 2025Research presented at the recent annual meeting of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy highlights outcomes among patients who have anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis that include reduced exacerbations and need for immunoglobulin.
Read More