The results of a new survey, published in a recent white paper by HealthCare Executive Group and Change Healthcare, showed that a majority of executives are increasingly adopting social determinants of health into their programs.
The growing acceptance that population health is impacted more by what happens outside of the confines of a doctor’s office or hospital setting, rather than inside of it, is reflected in a new survey of healthcare executives. The survey, published in a recent white paper by HealthCare Executive Group and Change Healthcare, showed that a majority of executives are increasingly adopting social determinants of health (SDoH) into their programs.
Executives answering the survey were mostly payers, with other respondents being providers, third-party administrators, hospitals, government, consultants and analysts, and vendors.
SDoH are the factors that contribute to a person’s health, such as where they live and work, their housing situation, and their access to healthy food. For instance, rather than treating the diseases caused by weight gain and/or unhealthy diets, a partnership made up of healthcare providers, nutritional consultants, and other team members might work together to help patients achieve a healthy weight.
Or an environmental team might assess a home for mold, vermin and other allergens that contribute to allergic asthma and recommend and initiate repairs in conjunction with a housing authority.
In this survey, conducted last year, respondents said they were doing the following with SDoH:
However, fewer organizations were training physicians to identify social determinants (21.3%), or using point-of-care checklists to identify potential social determinants (20.7%).
This survey did not address Medicaid specifically, but its release comes as states are turning to work requirements for beneficiaries and considering putting a lifetime limit on benefits.
Last month, a report from the National Quality Forum outlined a systematic approach to address how to coordinate the unmet food and housing needs of Medicaid beneficiaries. The report noted that that the healthcare system does not routinely collect SDoH data or coordinate care to address social needs. Increasingly, Medicaid programs are working to connect health and non-health services.
In another interesting finding, this survey showed that creating positive incentives and establishing provider-patient partnering programs work best at encouraging healthy behavior change. Positive incentives can take the form of lower premiums or rewards for meeting healthcare goals.
Offering incentives were used by 25.4% of respondents, and offering partnerships came in second, at 23.7%. Just 3.4% of respondents said high-deductible health plans were used to achieve behavior change, and the report said such plans may actually deter patients from seeking care. Healthcare is transitioning from negative to positive incentives to influence consumer behavior faster than most expect, the report said.
The report also identified the value-based reimbursement models used most by the respondents. The top 3 were risk-sharing (45.6%); pay-for-performance (43%); and full capitation (34.9%). The respondents said those same top 3 would be the models most effective at delivering performance-based care within the next 3 years. They also said those 3 models would gain in predicted effectiveness over the next 3 years.
Bundled payments, which came in consistently fourth on the list, was expected to drop in predicted effectiveness over the next 3 years.
NAACOS Continues Pushing Forward on the Transition to Value-Based Care
September 21st 2020Allison Brennan, MPP, discusses legislation that would affect accountable care organizations (ACOs), the impact coronavirus disease 2019 had on ACOs, and the fall National Association of ACOs meeting.
Listen
Examining Physician-Initiated Alternative Payment Models, a New Wave of Payment Reform
September 12th 2019To date, most alternative payment models (APMs) that have emerged in the shift toward value-based care have been initiated by payers and focused on primary care providers. However, there has recently been a new wave of payment reform in which providers, mostly specialists, are designing and implementing their own APMs in their practices. A study published in the September issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® analyzed some of these new payment models to gain insight into what providers are prioritizing in their APMs.
Listen
Clinical Trials Won’t Cause Financial Harm for Practices in Medicare Payment Models, Study Finds
June 28th 2024Ishwaria Subbiah, MD, of SCRI Oncology Partners, discusses new findings presented at ASCO 2024. This interview will appear in the annual ASCO recap issue of Evidence-Based Oncology.
Read More
NAACOS Continues Pushing Forward on the Transition to Value-Based Care
September 21st 2020Allison Brennan, MPP, discusses legislation that would affect accountable care organizations (ACOs), the impact coronavirus disease 2019 had on ACOs, and the fall National Association of ACOs meeting.
Listen
Examining Physician-Initiated Alternative Payment Models, a New Wave of Payment Reform
September 12th 2019To date, most alternative payment models (APMs) that have emerged in the shift toward value-based care have been initiated by payers and focused on primary care providers. However, there has recently been a new wave of payment reform in which providers, mostly specialists, are designing and implementing their own APMs in their practices. A study published in the September issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® analyzed some of these new payment models to gain insight into what providers are prioritizing in their APMs.
Listen
Clinical Trials Won’t Cause Financial Harm for Practices in Medicare Payment Models, Study Finds
June 28th 2024Ishwaria Subbiah, MD, of SCRI Oncology Partners, discusses new findings presented at ASCO 2024. This interview will appear in the annual ASCO recap issue of Evidence-Based Oncology.
Read More
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512