Despite conventional guidelines, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) may be more effective than wide local excision (WLE) for treatment of localized tumors.
A study on overall survival after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for early-stage Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) found MMS was associated with significant improvement compared with survival in patients who underwent conventional wide local excision (WLE).
This national retrospective cohort study was published in JAMA Dermatology. The authors limited their analysis to Tumor 1/Tumor 2 (T1/T2) MCC because these tumors are more amenable to any surgical approach.
"For those with localized disease, it is generally accepted that surgery is the most effective definitive treatment option," they explained. "However, there is some controversy as to the optimal surgical approach for these cases."
MCC is a rare type of skin cancer with a propensity to rapidly metastasize to regional lymph nodes, in which current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy. This study compared the use of MMS with WLE to assess overall survival in patients with localized MCC with pathologically confirmed negative lymph nodes.
Doctor screening a patient for skin cancer.
The study included data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) in adults with T1/T2 MCC who were diagnosed from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2018, who had been treated with surgery. A total of 22,610 patients were identified.
Patients were excluded if they had positive lymph node disease, were missing data on clinical lymph node status, had clinically negative distant metastatic disease, were not treated with surgical excision, without T1/T2 disease, and did not have confirmed pathologically negative lymph node(s). Furthermore, patients were excluded if they had other nonkeratinocyte malignant neoplasms or were diagnosed after 2019 because of a lack of survival data on these patients.
After exclusion, 2313 patients were met all inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age of patients was 71 (10.6) years, with 1340 (57.9%) of them men.
The statistical analysis showed excision with MMS had the best unadjusted survival, with mean (SE) survival rates of 87.4% (3.4%) at 3 years, 84.5% (3.9%) at 5-years, and 81.8% (4.6%) at 10 years compared with WLE, which had mean (SE) survival rates of 86.1% (0.9%) at 3 years, 76.9% (1.2%) at 5-years, and 60.9% (2%) at 10 years.
Additionally, similar results were observed in patients who received narrow-margin excision, with mean (SE) survival rates of 84.8% (1.4%) at 3 years, 78.3% (1.7%) at 5 years, and 60.8% (3.6%) at 10 years.
Multivariable survival analysis showed excision with MMS was associated with significant improved survival outcomes compared with WLE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97; P = .014). Furthermore, high-volume MCC centers were significantly more likely to use MMS over WLE compared with other centers (odds ratio [OR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.63-2.44; P < .001)
However, the researchers acknowledged some limitations to the study, such as being unable to collect data on locoregional recurrence of disease specific survival, the analysis was not controlled for patient immunosuppression status, and the MSS group had much fewer patients than in the WLE group. Furthermore, the researchers believe that further studies need to be done, given the lack of randomization and potential for selection bias.
“These data suggest that MMS may provide a survival benefit in the treatment of localized MCC, although further prospective work studying this issue is required,” wrote the researchers. “Future directions may also focus on elucidating the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy in localized cases treated with MMS.”
Despite these limitations, the study shows the use of MMS may be a better treatment option for patients with early-stage MCC with pathologically confirmed negative regional lymph node disease, compared with WLE.
Reference
Cheraghlou S, Doudican NA, Criscito MC, Stevenson ML, Carucci JA. Overall survival after Mohs surgery for early-stage Merkel cell carcinoma. JAMA Dermatology. Published online August 23, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.2822
Could On-Body Delivery of Isatuximab Bring More Competition to Anti-CD38 Myeloma Treatment?
June 6th 2025Results for IRAKLIA show noninferiority for Sanofi's on-body delivery system for isatuximab, compared with IV administration. Patients overwhelmingly preferred the hands-free delivery option.
Read More
ICS Use Tied to Fewer Exacerbations in Patients With Bronchiectasis and Elevated Blood Eosinophils
June 6th 2025Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use was common among patients with bronchiectasis and was associated with reduced exacerbations and hospitalizations in those with elevated blood eosinophil counts.
Read More
Real-World Data Support Luspatercept vs ESAs for Anemia in Lower-Risk MDS
June 5th 2025Patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received luspatercept showed greater hemoglobin gains and transfusion independence compared with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in a real-world analysis.
Read More
At EHA 2025, Hematology Discussions Will Stretch Across Lifespans and Locations
June 5th 2025The 2025 European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress, convening virtually and in Milan, Italy, from June 12 to June 15, 2025, will feature a revamped program structure for the meeting’s 30th anniversary while maintaining ample opportunities to network, debate, and absorb practice-changing findings in hematology and oncology.
Read More