Savings hospitals had lower baseline spending than nonsavings hospitals during the first year of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, according to a Research Letter in JAMA.
Savings hospitals had lower baseline spending than nonsavings hospitals during the first year of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, according to a Research Letter in JAMA.
Medicare’s CJR program offers bundled payments for hip and knee surgery at 799 hospitals that include payments for hospitalization and post-discharge care 90 days after the procedure into a single benchmark. The program incentivizes hospitals through bonus payments to exceed their quality and cost benchmarks. Overall, 67 urban markets in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were required by Medicare to participate in the program.
Recently, Medicare has declared the most hospitals in 34 of 67 MSAs must continue participating in the CJR program, while low-volume hospitals could choose whether to continue or withdraw. The study evaluated Medicare’s change in policy and how it affects the future of mandatory bundled payment models.
The researchers used Medicare data to analyze the proportion, distribution, and quality performance of CJR hospitals that achieved savings during the first year of CJR. This was then compared to the pre-CJR baseline which took place from April 2015 to March 2016. Volume was calculated from 100% Medicare claims from 2015 to 2016.
Of the 799 CJR hospitals, 48% were savings hospitals, and mean episode savings ranged from $13.83 to $3590.97. 92% of the savings hospitals achieved good or exceptional level quality. Generally, savings hospitals had a greater number of hospital beds than nonsavings hospitals and had a greater average annual Medicare joint replacement value.
In addition, savings hospitals were more likely to be nonprofit, teaching, and integrated with a post-acute care facility compared to nonsavings hospitals. Nonsavings hospitals were more frequently considered safety-net hospitals. In terms of evaluating proportion, savings hospitals did not differ between mandatory and voluntary MSAs.
“Nevertheless, these findings suggest that certain hospital types may be better positioned to succeed in mandatory bundled payment compared with others, particularly as policy changes affect the number and composition of hospitals and markets required to participate,” the authors concluded.
References
Navathe AS, Liao JM, Shah Y, et al. Characteristics of hospitals earning savings in the first year of mandatory bundled payment for hip and knee surgery. JAMA. 2018;319(9):930-932. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0678.
Laundromats as a New Frontier in Community Health, Medicaid Outreach
May 29th 2025Lindsey Leininger, PhD, and Allister Chang, MPA, highlight the potential of laundromats as accessible, community-based settings to support Medicaid outreach, foster trust, and connect families with essential health and social services.
Listen
Managed Care Reflections: A Q&A With Dora Hughes, MD, MPH
September 4th 2025To mark the 30th anniversary of The American Journal of Managed Care, each issue in 2025 includes a special feature: reflections from a thought leader on what has changed—and what has not—over the past 3 decades and what’s next for managed care. The September issue features a conversation with Dora Hughes, MD, MPH, chief medical officer and director of the Center for Clinical Standards and Quality at CMS.
Read More
Contributor: Why US Health Care Is Ripe for Change
September 2nd 2025Why is health care so staggeringly difficult to use? How do we fix it? To move forward, we first must look back, because the system we have today was not really designed, it evolved, notes Ariela Simerman, Turquoise Health.
Read More